Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Durham’s approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Xxxxxx’x achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year > 70% 77.9% 81.2% 2nd to 3rd Year > 80% 81.5% 87.6% 3rd to 4th Year n/a n/a n/a • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Durham to calculate the retention rates indicated above: In order to calculate the retention rates, the following methodology was followed: - all 1‐year programs and graduate certificate programs were removed from the data; - For the 1st to 2nd year retention rate, all 2‐ and 3‐year programs were included in the data and the rate was calculated using March 1st audited enrolment in Year One of the programs, divided by November 1st enrolment in Year Two of the next academic year; - For 2nd to 3rd year retention rate, only 3‐year programs were included in the data and the rate was calculated using March 1st audited enrolment in Year Two of the 3‐year programs, divided by November 1st enrolment in Year Three of the next academic year. 32 • • Please provide one or more example in the space provided below of a promising practice that Durham used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. Student Academic Learning Services The Student Academic Learning Services team provides supplemental academic support to students in all schools to support overall student retention and success initiatives. These staff members have provided specialized assistance to both First Generation college students, in addition to our growing ESL and EAL (English as an Additional Language) populations, who are, generally speaking, higher risk academically and more vulnerable to attrition. This team coordinates peer tutoring programs, one‐on‐one learning strategy sessions, subject specific support, writing assistance, and workshops for students. The team also works closely with individual faculty members as well as student liaisons to ensure that students are referred to our services at the first sign of academic difficulty.
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Trent University's approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Trent University's achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 82% 81% 82% 2nd to 3rd Year 56% 71% 72% 3rd to 4th Year 51% 76% 65% • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Trent University to calculate the retention rates indicated above The methodology used is the same methodology used for CSRDE reporting. The 1st to 2nd year retention rate is based on the percentage of the new, full-time students from the fall of 2008 who were at the university in the fall of 2009. The 2nd to 3rd year retention rate is based on the percentage of the new, full-time students from the fall of 2007 who were at the university in the fall of 2009. The 3rd to 4th year retention rate is based on the percentage of the new, full-time students from the fall of 2006 who were at the university in the fall of 2009 (taking into account those who graduated with a 3 year degree). • Please provide one or more examples in the space provided below of a promising practice that Trent University used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. Trent's Living Learning Program is a way to make the most of the residence experience by providing students with an opportunity to get involved in various activities and to meet new people who share similar interests. Students in the Living Learning Program are offered enriched programming based on initiative, interests and enthusiasm from the students themselves, as well as involvement from campus and community partners. In 2009-10, there were 5 theme-based Living Learning Communities at Trent coordinated by the Living Learning Program.
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Algoma‟s approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Algoma‟s achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 73% 74% 75 2nd to 3rd Year 84% 88 3rd to 4th Year 96% 98 Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Algoma to calculate the retention rates indicated above: The percentage of first-time, full-time first year students in a given fall term who return to the institution the next fall. For example, first year students who began in fall 2008 were gauged for the fall 2009. This process is repeated for upper year students. Please provide one or more example in the space provided below of a promising practice that Algoma used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. Retention is directly linked to engagement and student satisfaction. Indicators of student engagement include collaborative learning, student-faculty interaction, and a supportive campus environment. Encourage students to choose their program of study early on and to become fully engaged in life at Algoma U. Recognize the direct link of retention to academic programs and their quality. Program development encouraging four-year specialized programs. Continue to offer a free, one-week transition to university program for students with special needs offered for any university- bound Sault Ste. Xxxxx or Algoma District student who has been identified with a special need. Promote on-line, distance, and blended methods of course delivery. Implement support measures for first generation students by continuing to assist and expand the mentor/role model program to support FG recruitment and retention efforts. Identify at risk student early to ensure that they have all academic support to promote academic success. Monitoring the ratio of students that are placed on probation and those that are named to the Xxxx‟s Honour List
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Ryerson’s approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Xxxxxxx’x achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 (not comparable to 2008- 09 due to change in academic policy) 1st to 2nd Year 88.0% - 90.0% 89% 83%* (88%)* 2nd to 3rd Year 90.0% - 93.0% 93% 91% 3rd to 4th Year • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Ryerson to calculate the retention rates indicated above: * The 2009-10 retention rate reflects a recent academic policy change where some students stop out temporarily. Had the former academic policy been in place, the CSRDE measured retention rate would have been within the former 2008-09 target at 88%. Used Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE) method:
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Xxxxxx Xxxxx’x approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Xxxxxx Xxxxx’x achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 70% 66% (75% persistence) 71% (76%) 2nd to 3rd Year 76% 63% (79%) 82% (88%) 3rd to 4th Year 80% 88% (90%) 88% (93%) • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Xxxxxx Xxxxx to calculate the retention rates indicated above: Year Of Study Enrolled Stdn Return Year Returning Stdn Retention Persistence 1 6,900 1 360 71% 76% 2 4,899 2 1,653 2 103 82% 88% 3 1,358 3 138 3 7 88% 93% 4 121 Year of study - the year of study in which the student was enrolled in any of the terms 200801, 200802 and 200803 Enrolled Students - full-time domestic students enrolled in programs of duration greater than two semesters, funded through the General Purpose Operating Grant in any of terms 200801, 200802 and 200803. Return Year - the highest year of study for the student in terms 200901, 200902 and 200903. Returning Students - full-time domestic students enrolled in programs of duration greater than two semesters, funded through the General Purpose Operating Grant in any of terms 200901, 200902 and 200903. Retention - the ratio of the number of students who have advanced, in any of terms 200901, 200902 and 200903, to the next year of study from their respective standing in any of terms 200801, 200802 and 200803 to the corresponding number in the Enrolled Students column. Persistence - the ratio of the number of students who returned to the College (Returning Students column), irrespective of their advancement, in any of terms 200901, 200902 and 200903, to the corresponding number in the Enrolled Students column. • • Please provide one or more examples in the space provided below of a promising practice that Xxxxxx Xxxxx used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight.
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Xxxxxx’s approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Xxxxxx’s achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 68.5% 66.4% 67.3% 2nd to 3rd Year 80% 79.0% 82.4% 3rd to 4th Year 90% 91.9% 91.7% • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Xxxxxx to calculate the retention rates indicated above: 1st year to 2nd year retention (B)/(A)*100:
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in University of Ontario Institute of Technology's approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify University of Ontario Institute of Technology's achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 81% 80% 83% 2nd to 3rd Year 91% 84% 91% 3rd to 4th Year 96% 93% 95% • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by University of Ontario Institute of Technology to calculate the retention rates indicated above UOIT moved to the CSRDE methodology to calculate student retention rates. This methodology is cohort-based, as opposed to tracking students from year to year. • Please provide one or more examples in the space provided below of a promising practice that University of Ontario Institute of Technology used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. UOIT administered for the first time a ‘Foundations for Academic Learning & Success’ course in the 2010 winter term. This course is designed for students with under-performing university study skills – also a key group that is more likely to not be retained.
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Fanshawe College's approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Fanshawe College's achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 77% 76% 76% 2nd to 3rd Year 89% 87% 90% 3rd to 4th Year Improve 95% 99% • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Fanshawe College to calculate the retention rates indicated above Retention rate is based on official count date enrolments for up to four academic years ending with the most recent count date data. To retain cohort continuity, data for successive years below the final year of a program is taken for successively preceding years back to first year. Thus, for example, the current rates for a mature three year program draw from data in four year cohorts covering the time span from fall 2004 to winter 2010. The College-wide retention rate for year n to year n+1 is calculated by dividing the sum of count date data for all levels in year n+1 by the sum of all count date data for all levels in year n, only for those programs of n+1 years duration. • Please provide one or more examples in the space provided below of a promising practice that Fanshawe College used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight.
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in University of Ottawa's approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify University of Ottawa's achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 88% - 90% 87% 88% 2nd to 3rd Year 83% - 85% 80% 79% Historical range 77 to 83. 3rd to 4th Year N/A N/A N/A • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by University of Ottawa to calculate the retention rates indicated above Retention rates according to the methodology of the Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE). • Please provide one or more examples in the space provided below of a promising practice that University of Ottawa used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. Student mentoring is a form of peer help that endeavours to maximize student success. It is specifically designed to support the development of more efficient learning strategies, to strengthen personal motivation and commitment to university studies, and to sustain academic excellence and an unparalleled student experience. XXXX works in close collaboration with faculties and university services to provide mentoring programs.
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Confederation’s approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Confederation’s achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 63.7% 72.7% 75.5% 2nd to 3rd Year 84.4% 88.3% 85.0% 3rd to 4th Year n/a n/a n/a • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Confederation to calculate the retention rates indicated above:
