Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Trent University's approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Trent University's achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 82% 81% 82% 2nd to 3rd Year 56% 71% 72% 3rd to 4th Year 51% 76% 65% • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Trent University to calculate the retention rates indicated above The methodology used is the same methodology used for CSRDE reporting. The 1st to 2nd year retention rate is based on the percentage of the new, full-time students from the fall of 2008 who were at the university in the fall of 2009. The 2nd to 3rd year retention rate is based on the percentage of the new, full-time students from the fall of 2007 who were at the university in the fall of 2009. The 3rd to 4th year retention rate is based on the percentage of the new, full-time students from the fall of 2006 who were at the university in the fall of 2009 (taking into account those who graduated with a 3 year degree). • Please provide one or more examples in the space provided below of a promising practice that Trent University used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. Trent's Living Learning Program is a way to make the most of the residence experience by providing students with an opportunity to get involved in various activities and to meet new people who share similar interests. Students in the Living Learning Program are offered enriched programming based on initiative, interests and enthusiasm from the students themselves, as well as involvement from campus and community partners. In 2009-10, there were 5 theme-based Living Learning Communities at Trent coordinated by the Living Learning Program.
1. The Active Living Community which is home to students who have an interest in active living, themes of wellness and outdoor adventure. This community motivates members to initiate active leadership projects for the greater community. Past Active Living events have included climbing, outdoor skill-building workshops, peer-to-peer motivation for a healthy lifestyle and more.
2. The Trent Global ...
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Xxxxxx’s approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Xxxxxx’s achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 68.5% 66.4% 67.3% 2nd to 3rd Year 80% 79.0% 82.4% 3rd to 4th Year 90% 91.9% 91.7% • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Xxxxxx to calculate the retention rates indicated above: 1st year to 2nd year retention (B)/(A)*100:
(A) No. of 1st time F/T or P/T students enrolled in 2-yr, 3-yr or degree programs in Fall 2008 and Winter 2009 as of audit count date (B) No. of F/T or P/T students re-enrolled during the 2nd year of study in Fall 2009 as of audit count date. 2nd year to 3rd year retention (D)/(C)*100:
(C) No. of F/T or P/T students from 2007/2008 cohort re-enrolled in 3-yr or degree programs during the 2nd year of study in Fall 2008 as of audit count date
(D) No. of F/T or P/T students re-enrolled during the 3rd year of study in Fall 2009 as of audit count date. 3rd year to 4th year retention (F)/(E)*100:
(E) No. of F/T or P/T students from 2006/2007 cohort re-enrolled in degree programs during the 3rd year of study in Fall 2008 as of audit count date.
(F) No. of F/T or P/T students re-enrolled during the 4th year of study in Fall 2009 as of audit count date. • Please provide one or more example in the space provided below of a promising practice that Xxxxxx used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. Xxxxxx has been recognized for its work to support new approaches to student services and research, which have improved retention rates. The Seneca-led Foundations for Success pilot was the first-ever Canadian experimental, random assignment research project to investigate the effect of case-managed support services on college student retention. 3,141 college students, including 1,197 from Seneca, participated in the study, which found that directed advisement to student support services, in combination with financial incentives, led to a 6.4% increase in student retention project-wide and an 11% increase in student retention at Seneca. The SUCCESS@Seneca program continues to provide...
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in York’s approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Xxxx’s achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 87.9% 86.8% 86.8% 2nd to 3rd Year 81.1% 80.8% 80.7% 3rd to 4th Year N/A N/A N/A • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by York to calculate the retention rates indicated above: As agreed in the 2006 Multi-year Action plan, Xxxx continues to participate in the Consortium on Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE) and to report retention rates based on the CSRDE methodology. • Please provide one or more example in the space provided below of a promising practice that York used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. One of the key factors driving graduation rates is the retention of students, particularly first and second year students who exhibit the lowest retention rates. York University’s Retention Council brings together faculty and staff from across the institution to monitor retention issues that exist at York and coordinate activities in the planning, design, implementation and evaluation of interventions. Committees of the Retention Council have been established to further investigate issues such as the first year experience, peer mentoring and academic advising. Xxxx is also undertaking research aimed at 1) providing a quantitative characterization of the various factors that are associated with undergraduate retention and attrition; and 2) developing methods to identify, as early in an academic session as possible, York students who may be at risk of leaving their university studies, either on a temporary or permanent basis. This work was ongoing in 2009-10 and will continue in the year ahead, and will continue to inform the work of the Retention Council.
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Lakehead’s approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Lakehead’s achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 88% 86% 86% 2nd to 3rd Year 80% 77% 77% 3rd to 4th Year N/A 69%* 70%* Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Lakehead to calculate the retention rates indicated above: Lakehead University participates in the Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE). Using the CSRDE methodology, retention is calculated as the percent of first time, full time baccalaureate degree-seeking freshmen who are enrolled in a given fall who return the following fall. *It should be noted that between 7% and 9% of our students successfully graduate at the end of year three and are therefore not included in the 3rd to 4th year retention figures. Please provide one or more example in the space provided below of a promising practice that Lakehead used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. Student Affairs promotes its programs and services in several formats and by doing so has increased students’ awareness of the programs and services available to them. Raising awareness is a significant factor in supporting access, retention and success of our learners. Programs and services offered to students include Academic Advising, counselling and tutoring. These services are student centred and offered on a schedule that is in sync with the academic cycle. For example advisors and tutors offer extended hours during key periods such as during mid- terms and exam study periods. The Learning Assistance Centre, Financial Aid and Academic Advising all provide services and advice that are customised to each student’s situation. Student Services focuses on working with students deemed "at risk", to help resolve any issues preventing them from completing their course of study.
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in OCAD University's approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify OCAD University's achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 87%-89% 86% 86.0% 2nd to 3rd Year 88%-91% 87% 88.0* 3rd to 4th Year 89%-91% 87% 90.0% • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by OCAD University to calculate the retention rates indicated above Year 1 includes all new undergraduate admissions to OCAD University (including all part-time and full-time students, and all transfer students) Year 2 includes all students returning the following year Year 3 includes all students returning from the previous year (2) Year 4 includes all students returning from the previous year (3) • Please provide one or more examples in the space provided below of a promising practice that OCAD University used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. OCAD University restructured the administration of its Faculty offices to provide closer contact with students, including giving program Chairs direct responsibility for students and creating dedicated program assistants to support Chairs and students. The Office of the Registrar has increased its vigilance to ensure that students are progressing smoothly and it sends reminder emails to students who need to contact a faculty advisor. All front-line staff received customer service training to enhance their communication skills and all staff have been given training to sensitize them to the special needs of students with visible and invisible disabilities.
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Xxxxx’x approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Xxxxx’x achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 92% 86% 87% 2nd to 3rd Year 92% 86% 89% 3rd to 4th Year 85% 87% 91% Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Xxxxx to calculate the retention rates indicated above: Please provide one or more example in the space provided below of a promising practice that Xxxxx used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. In 2009-2010, both student services and academic units at Xxxxx University offered a suite of programming aimed at improving student retention. These included on the student services side, initiatives from the Registrar’s Office team of Academic Advisors: - A Virtual Orientation Session for part-time, mature and transfer students; - Expanded online services including two online presentations to guide students into their second-year of studies and for those currently on, or facing academic probation; - Extended use of social media including Facebook and Twitter; - Development of an Academic Success Guide and Academic Recovery Guide for students at risk (both print and online); - New partnership with Residence Life Management to extend Academic Advising Services into residences; - Offering of outreach sessions and evening information sessions targeting specific groups of students; - Implementation of extended advising hours to accommodate the diverse needs of our student population.
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Algoma‟s approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Algoma‟s achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 73% 74% 75 2nd to 3rd Year 84% 88 3rd to 4th Year 96% 98 Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Algoma to calculate the retention rates indicated above: Please provide one or more example in the space provided below of a promising practice that Algoma used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. Retention is directly linked to engagement and student satisfaction. Indicators of student engagement include collaborative learning, student-faculty interaction, and a supportive campus environment. Encourage students to choose their program of study early on and to become fully engaged in life at Algoma U. Recognize the direct link of retention to academic programs and their quality. Program development encouraging four-year specialized programs. Continue to offer a free, one-week transition to university program for students with special needs offered for any university- bound Sault Ste. Xxxxx or Algoma District student who has been identified with a special need. Promote on-line, distance, and blended methods of course delivery. Implement support measures for first generation students by continuing to assist and expand the mentor/role model program to support FG recruitment and retention efforts. Identify at risk student early to ensure that they have all academic support to promote academic success. Monitoring the ratio of students that are placed on probation and those that are named to the Xxxx‟s Honour List
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in University of Ottawa's approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify University of Ottawa's achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 88% - 90% 87% 88% 2nd to 3rd Year 83% - 85% 80% 79% Historical range 77 to 83. 3rd to 4th Year N/A N/A N/A • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by University of Ottawa to calculate the retention rates indicated above Retention rates according to the methodology of the Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE). • Please provide one or more examples in the space provided below of a promising practice that University of Ottawa used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. Student mentoring is a form of peer help that endeavours to maximize student success. It is specifically designed to support the development of more efficient learning strategies, to strengthen personal motivation and commitment to university studies, and to sustain academic excellence and an unparalleled student experience. XXXX works in close collaboration with faculties and university services to provide mentoring programs.
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in Xxxxxx Xxxxx’x approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify Xxxxxx Xxxxx’x achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 70% 66% (75% persistence) 71% (76%) 2nd to 3rd Year 76% 63% (79%) 82% (88%) 3rd to 4th Year 80% 88% (90%) 88% (93%) • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by Xxxxxx Xxxxx to calculate the retention rates indicated above: 1 6,900 1 360 71% 76% 2 4,899 2 1,653 2 103 82% 88% 3 1,358 3 138 3 7 88% 93% 4 121 • • Please provide one or more examples in the space provided below of a promising practice that Xxxxxx Xxxxx used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight.
Student Retention Rates. The table below has been pre-populated with the proposed results set for 2008-09 in University of Ontario Institute of Technology's approved Multi-Year Action Plan. Referring to these proposed results, please identify University of Ontario Institute of Technology's achieved results for 2009-10. Proposed Result for 2008-09 From Action Plan Retention Rate Achieved For 2008-09 Retention Rate Achieved For 2009-10 1st to 2nd Year 81% 80% 83% 2nd to 3rd Year 91% 84% 91% 3rd to 4th Year 96% 93% 95% • Please indicate in the space below the methodology used by University of Ontario Institute of Technology to calculate the retention rates indicated above UOIT moved to the CSRDE methodology to calculate student retention rates. This methodology is cohort-based, as opposed to tracking students from year to year. • Please provide one or more examples in the space provided below of a promising practice that University of Ontario Institute of Technology used during 2009-10 related to student retention. A promising practice could be a strategy, initiative or program viewed by the institution to be an innovative practice, success story and/or key accomplishment that the institution would like to highlight. UOIT administered for the first time a ‘Foundations for Academic Learning & Success’ course in the 2010 winter term. This course is designed for students with under-performing university study skills – also a key group that is more likely to not be retained.