Task 4 Sample Clauses

Task 4. Design and Facilitate Peer-to-Peer Web-Based Distance Learning Events: $21,000 (Minimum of 1 kick-off event and 3 web-based learning events) One kick-off web event to orient participating communities Within 30 days of contract execution Agendas for each web-based learning event (draft and final) Draft: 30 days prior to each event date Final: 20 days prior to each event date Event 1 Event 2 Event 3 Complete materials set for each web- based learning event (draft and final) Draft: 10 days prior to each event date Final: 5 days prior to each event date Event 1 Event 2 Event 3 At least three web-based learning events Date of event Event 1 Event 2 Event 3 Summary reports evaluating each web- based learning event Within 15 days of event Event 1 Event 2 Event 3 Task 5: Provide Community Facilitation for Each Participating Community Team: $70,000 Summary of key goals and objectives, and high-level timeline and reporting mechanisms to track progress for each participating community July 15, 2016 Provide community facilitation services Ongoing Monthly reports to the State on facilitation activities and community progress Monthly Task 6: Develop a Final Report: $24,000 Final report (draft and final) Draft: 45 days prior to contract end date Final: 7 days prior to contract end date Final high-level curriculum 7 days prior to contract end date Task 7: Ongoing Reporting: $5,000 Monthly progress reports (submitted with invoices) Monthly INVOICE TOTAL Remittance Address: Xxxx to Address: Xxxxx Xxxxx Department of Vermont Health Access (DVHA) NOB 1 South, 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 XxxxxXxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx DVHA BO USE: *INVOICE PAYMENTS ARE NET30 TERMS, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Task 4. 3: Prepare Tracings & Bidding Documents Upon completion of over-the-shoulder review and final approval of the Final Plans, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCYthe final tracings plan submission in 22” x 34” format, contract documents for bidding. Assumptions: • Only three (3) plan submittals will be made to LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY: Preliminary Plans, Final Plans, Final Tracings and they will be made with the Road/Pavement set of plans. • Over-the-shoulder reviews will be completed by the LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY to accelerate review and revisions. • Conduit, handholes, pedestals, poles, cabinets are anticipated. • Connection is expected at IoT lab. • Existing drainage system will be retained and re-used. • Modular add-on of proprietary technology components may require additional design scope or fee. • Utility conflicts will be avoided, and no utility relocation will be required. • Any utility potholing will be completed by LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY. Items Specifically Not Included: • Final Field Check Meeting. • Subsurface Utility Engineering (XXX) to determine existing utility locations at a quality level A, which would include test holes to determine horizontal and vertical location of utilities. • In-pavement charging technology equipment. • In-pavement materials performance monitoring equipment.
Task 4. The contractor shall ensure that all eligibility requirements have been met by the applicant prior to evaluation. Evaluation of each application should be based on all available evidence of merit, including, but not limited to: Graduate Record Examinations (GRE), undergraduate transcripts, personal statements, and reference evaluation forms. Applications that are incomplete and/or do not meet minimum eligibility requirements should not be made available to panel members for evaluation. The contractor shall successfully solicit the willing participation of high caliber evaluators from academia, government (DoD and other federal agencies), and industry who have doctoral degrees from the science and engineering disciplines (S&E). The contractor shall make all reasonable efforts to ensure that evaluation panels include a minimum of three (3) DoD (AF, Army, & Navy) S&Es per research discipline area. Selection of qualified evaluators is a vital component in the successful operation of the program. While the ARL relies on the contractor to identify and convene appropriate panels of technical experts, the agencies reserve the right to review and approve recommended panelists. The contractor shall arrange and coordinate discipline-specific panel meetings to review and evaluate applications. After a rank order listing of the applicants is submitted per discipline, ARL will make final selections for bestowal of Student recipient awards.
Task 4. Re-Evaluation Our team is aware of the many additional activities that may arise from the Environmental Review Process. In addition to these identified activities, sometimes new circumstances may be made known during site construction activities. In these instances, MPACT will assess the changes and will utilize HUD Environmental Regulations at §58.47 to re-evaluate the original environmental findings and coordinate any additional need for republication and/or further consultation with appropriate regulatory agencies. Most importantly, any identified environmental concerns that are identified will be forwarded to appropriate Fort Bend County staff to assure that potential mitigation requirements are incorporated into the construction build plans.
Task 4. Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Support Services (PSC DA01) The Contractor shall provide the full range of development, maintenance, architecture, technical, management, planning, communications and engagement support services with the associated skills and qualifications required to support CBP Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Community of Practice (COP) Program. The Contractor support may include, but is not limited to the following: • Development of architecture guidance, configuration standards, operational guidance, rollout strategy. • Propagating knowledge and standards across CBP. • Collaborating with Mission Stakeholder and OIT Program Offices to review needs, provide design and development guidance, and capture relevant metrics for executive reporting. • Implementing programs to measure and report effectiveness and value of the new platforms. • Supporting license management and administration. • Identifying, establishing, and maintaining support for all identified and defined governance activities. • Conducting code reviews with project teams and process owners, and deployment management support. • Providing 24x7x365 on-call remote support to corrective issues on automations, as identified by CBP. • Participating in the CBP Enterprise Architecture and Business Office governance process through which OIT manages technology standards, configuration control, and deployment lifecycle. • Regularly advising CBP OIT Leadership on emerging technologies, tools, applications, and recommendations for improving the implementation of the agency’s platforms. • Maturing the operations across CBP by implementing standardized processes to use and maintain the platforms. • Management, enhancement, and support of the RPA Dashboard and SharePoint collaboration site. • Coordinating with the CBP infrastructure and security groups to establish the software engineering environment to support development, testing, deployment, and operation • Conducting awareness and training sessions; and, • Management and execution of security and accreditation and Authority to Operate (ATO) processes, including coordination with CBP OIT security teams and engineering support stakeholders to address them, as needed.
Task 4. Produce a final report summarising the responses reviewed, identifying themes and the evidence supplied and the procedures undertaken by the supplier in its analysis. The report should be in plain English and be in Microsoft Word and PDF format; it must be consistent in style and grammatically accurate; professionally typeset ready for publication on the Authority’s website under the suppliers branding and therefore accessible to both Airports Commission and stakeholders. The Provider will produce the report but the Authority will agree with the Provider the format for this report and the Provider will provide the Authority with drafts of this report for comment. The provider will present the final report, once it has been signed off by the Authority, to the Authority. The firm timetable regarding the reviewing will be agreed in the initial meeting with the Provider.
Task 4. Provide funding for Public Defender Office Family Court Division staff to attend CLEs, other trainings, and convenings related to the delivery of legal representation of parents in Family Court matters. Funding can also be used for to host CLEs, trainings, and convenings, with costs including space, speaker fees, materials, and refreshments. Performance Measures: In consultation with ILS, identify key Performance Measures for the following:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Task 4. Software development (implementation of change requests and development, technical support to stakeholders for new connections and any ad-hoc corrective software maintenance resulting from the above 21
Task 4. Provide Data Analysis & Dashboards. Consultant will perform data analysis and develop integrated dashboards using ArcGIS Online and business analytics platform. This task may include, without limitation, the following work:
Task 4. Cleanup Planning $10,000 has been budgeted for cleanup planning. A contractual budget of $7,500 has been estimated for remedial planning. A budget of $2,500 for DEQ fees also has been estimated associated with remedial planning. The City’s environmental contractor will lead the Cleanup Planning task. The deliverables/milestone for this task will be an Analysis of Xxxxxxxxxx Cleanup Alternatives (ABCA) report. Cleanup planning will be conducted once the contaminant and wetland assessments are complete. We will develop an ABCA to identify cleanup alternatives and select a preferred cleanup method based on factors including effectiveness, implementability, sustainability, and cost.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.