Capability Assessment Sample Clauses

Capability Assessment. Where DHS has conducted a Capability Assessment for a Participant (Mutual Obligation), the Provider must: review the outcome of the Capability Assessment and consider actioning any recommendations arising from the outcome; and if the Capability Assessment found that the Participant is not capable of meeting the Mutual Obligation Requirements in their Job Plan, ensure that a Delegate updates the Participant’s Job Plan within the timeframe and as specified in the findings of the Capability Assessment and any Guidelines.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Capability Assessment. Where Services Australia has conducted a Capability Assessment for a Participant (Mutual Obligation), the Provider must: review the outcome of the Capability Assessment and consider actioning any recommendations arising from the outcome; and if the Capability Assessment found that the Participant is not capable of meeting the Mutual Obligation Requirements in their Job Plan, ensure that a Delegate updates the Participant’s Job Plan within the timeframe and as specified in the findings of the Capability Assessment and any Guidelines.
Sample 1Sample 2
Capability Assessment the process by which you contact all the Contractors qualified in a Lot to determine which are interested in bidding for your requirement. Catalogue – refers to the information provided by Contractors on the Government Procurement Service website including product details, pricing and the Contractor’s profile. Confidential Information – the information deemed confidential by you or the Contractor. Contract – the binding agreement between you and the Contractor for the provision of IT goods based on the Terms and Conditions of the Model Contract.
Sample 1Sample 2
Capability Assessment. (a) Teachers who satisfy the eligibility requirements in clause 50.2 shall be subject to a Capability Assessment based on the following criteria:
Sample 1
Capability Assessment. A Capability Assessment is not required by DMA 2000 and its implementing regulations. However, a Capability Assessment is recommended by Cal EMA/FEMA. As such URS will work with participating jurisdictions to complete tables which capture information regarding the following for each jurisdiction: ▪ Human and Technical Resources for Hazard Mitigation ▪ Financial Resources for Hazard Mitigation ▪ Legal and Regulatory Resources for Hazard Mitigation ▪ Current, Ongoing, and Completed Hazard Mitigation Projects and Programs
Sample 1
Capability Assessment. This assessment will be conducted to inventory those existing plans, policies, and procedures that the City has in place to temper the effect of hazards. This will include protective measures under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), building codes, zoning ordinances, completed or ongoing mitigation projects, and mitigation polices established in the general or comprehensive plans of participating jurisdictions. Technological and infrastructure vulnerabilities will also be noted in detail. Photographs of the vulnerabilities in Costa Mesa will be incorporated as appropriate or requested.
Sample 1
Capability Assessment. As part of the Plan update and as required by Cal OES, Wood will evaluate the County’s and participating jurisdictions’ existing capabilities to mitigate risk and vulnerabilities from natural, technological, and manmade hazards. The Capability Assessment will identify existing legal and regulatory tools addressing each hazard; discuss any applicable past, present, and future hazard mitigation programs; and assess the administrative, technical, and financial capabilities of first responders. The customized data collection guide discussed under Task 2 will be used to gather updated capability information from participating jurisdictions and agencies. By collecting information about existing programs, policies, regulations and emergency plans, Wood can assess those activities and measures already in place that contribute towards mitigating some of the vulnerabilities identified. Once updated, the Capability Assessment is compared to the Risk Assessment to “paint a picture” of the potential disaster impacts. The information obtained during this process details the “net vulnerability” of the area (i.e., vulnerability tempered by existing capabilities), and it provides a platform for developing mitigation goals. In addition, this information provides a baseline of what these likely impacts would cost, thus providing an estimate of the benefits of any resulting mitigation actions. This provides added value to the LHMP by ensuring integration of the plan with existing policies, procedures, and other plans and assists in the identification of additional mitigation strategies. Task 3 Deliverables • Prepare and distribute Data Collection Guide to HMPC • Draft Capability Assessment Task 4 Hazard Profile and Risk Assessment The first sub-task of the Risk Assessment and Natural Hazards Assessment is the Hazard Identification, which involves identifying and profiling hazard events that present a threat to both the incorporated and unincorporated parts of the County. The planning effort will identify natural hazards and prioritize them by significance. As part of the plan development process, the HMPC will then review the list of hazards during HMPC Meeting #2. Hazards evaluated will include, but not be limited to: • Adverse weather – including drought and extreme weather events • Agricultural pests and plant diseases • Biological agents • Coastal erosion • Coastal flooding and inundation • Earthquakes – including fault rupture and groundshaking • Flooding • Debris Flows ...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Capability Assessment. In requesting the delegation, the Territorial Authority has provided NZTA with the capability assessment attached as Schedule V. Should any material factor (noted as such in the schedule) in the capability assessment change, the Territorial Authority shall notify NZTA in writing of the change within 7 days of such change together with any proposed action to alleviate any reduction in the Territorial Authority's capability arising from the change.
Sample 1

Related to Capability Assessment

  • Conformity Assessment 1. The Parties recognize that a broad range of mechanisms exists to facilitate the acceptance of conformity assessment procedures and results thereby, including:

  • Security Assessment If Accenture reasonably determines, or in good faith believes, that Supplier’s security practices or procedures do not meet Supplier’s obligations under the Agreement, then Accenture will notify Supplier of the deficiencies. Supplier will without unreasonable delay: (i) correct such deficiencies at its own expense; (ii) permit Accenture, or its duly authorized representatives, to assess Supplier’s security-related activities that are relevant to the Agreement; and (iii) timely complete a security questionnaire from Accenture on a periodic basis upon Accenture’s request. Security issues identified by Accenture will be assigned risk ratings and an agreed-to timeframe to remediate. Supplier will remediate all the security issues identified within the agreed to timeframes. Upon Supplier’s failure to remediate any high or medium rated security issues within the stated timeframes, Accenture may terminate the Agreement in accordance with Section 8 above.

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013).

  • Impact Assessment If Service Provider desires to make any change, upgrade, replacement or addition that may have an adverse impact or require changes as described in Section 9.6(c) or increase the risk of Service Provider not being able to provide the Services in accordance with this Agreement or violate or be inconsistent with DIR Standards or Strategic Plans, then Service Provider shall prepare a written risk assessment and mitigation plan (1) describing in detail the nature and extent of such adverse impact or risk, (2) describing any benefits, savings or risks to DIR or the DIR Customers associated with such change, and (3) proposing strategies to mitigate any adverse risks or impacts associated with such change and, after consultation and agreement with DIR, implement the plan.

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • PROPERTY ASSESSMENT The Buyer and Seller hereby acknowledge that the Province of Ontario has implemented current value assessment and properties may be re-assessed on an annual basis. The Buyer and Seller agree that no claim will be made against the Buyer or Seller, or any Brokerage, Broker or Salesperson, for any changes in property tax as a result of a re-assessment of the property, save and except any property taxes that accrued prior to the completion of this transaction.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures.

  • Comprehensive Assessment an initial and ongoing part of the member-centered planning process employed by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to identify the member’s outcomes and the services and supports needed to help support those outcomes. It includes an ongoing process of using the knowledge and expertise of the member and caregivers to collect information about:

  • Needs Assessment 1. The Contractor shall conduct a cultural and linguistic group-needs assessment of the eligible client population in the Contractor’s service area to assess the language needs of the population and determine what reasonable steps are necessary to ensure meaningful access to services and activities to eligible individuals. [22 CCR 98310, 98314] The group-needs assessment shall take into account the following four (4) factors:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.