Project Tracking, Reporting and Evaluation. For guidance on this section, please refer to Appendix A and B of this Guide
Project Tracking, Reporting and Evaluation. For the duration of this Agreement, PPG will provide an annual summary report to EPA and, upon request, to Stakeholders. PPG will make all Project data and reports available to Stakeholders on request. The first annual report will be due one year following the signing of this Agreement. Succeeding annual reports will be due the same time each year during the life of this Agreement. In each annual report PPG will provide a summary of environmental performance data and will describe its progress toward completing the Project as described in this Agreement. The report should describe progress on all of the voluntary commitments contained in this Agreement. Other reports produced as part of the Project which address these subjects may be used as appropriate. An annual public meeting will be held, if deemed necessary, after the first annual report is issued. Reasonable advance meeting notice will be provided to the Agencies and Stakeholders. If a public meeting is scheduled, PPG or its representative will present the report to the Stakeholders at the public meeting.
Project Tracking, Reporting and Evaluation. The project tracking, reporting and evaluation will be accomplished for project sponsors including EPA in accordance with, among other things, EPA requests and the reporting requirements set by the (to- be-determined) funding agencies. The topics tracked, reported and evaluated have been referred to earlier in the section on "how we would measure improved environmental performance" (see Table 3).
Project Tracking, Reporting and Evaluation. The Department is committed to tracking and reporting the State’s progress in achieving the anticipated environmental benefits of this program. Current regulatory reporting mechanisms for all regulated facilities as applicable, such as Annual Emission Statements, Pollution Prevention Progress Reports and Toxic Release InventoryReports, will continue to be used by the Department to track trends in emission reductions. These reports, which will be submitted to the Department by each Gold Track participant, are public documents, and will serve as the basis for a Gold Track annual report to USEPA. The Department is committed, to the extent possible, under applicable state and federal requirements to allowing Internet access to the Gold Track annual report. In addition, there is a pollution prevention component of State-issued Operating Permits, whereby facilities are required to track and submit a report to the State, showing trends in annual emissions. This report will be expanded to include specific emission trends analysis for each Gold Track participant. As mentioned previously, each Gold Track participant will be encouraged to establish a system to monitor and track costs associated with Gold Track participation. Specific monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements are contained in the media-specific Addenda.
Project Tracking, Reporting and Evaluation. As set forth in this Agreement, the Project is expected to achieve superior environmental performance to that which would otherwise be achieved through traditional regulatory compliance. To evaluate the performance and results of the Project, OMP must prepare biannual evaluation reports to be submitted to EPA and PADEP, which will include the annual report elements outlined in Section 3.7.2. The biannual evaluation will include a summary of the efforts made by OMP with respect to the intentions and commitments in Section 5.1 and a summary of the performance targets in Section 5.3 above. EPA, PADEP and OMP will re-evaluate the regulatory flexibility and legal implementation mechanisms of the Project in the event that EPA or PADEP issues any proposed or new rule or regulation which has material relevance to the Project. In addition, the Parties will evaluate the status and overall success of the Project, as discussed in Section 5.7 below. OMP will prepare a draft evaluation report, which it will provide to the other stakeholders no later than ninety (90) days prior to the scheduled termination of the Project, which will include: An analysis of the superior environmental performance achieved by the Project as set forth in this Agreement, A comparison of the environmental benefits originally anticipated to result from OMP’s commitments under the Project and the benefits actually achieved by the Project, A review of any new statutory or regulatory requirements applicable to the Project, An analysis as to whether the continuation of the Project is warranted based on continued or future anticipated superior environmental performance, and If applicable, a proposal to continue the Project including any modifications or enhancements to the Project to continue achieving superior environmental performance.
Project Tracking, Reporting and Evaluation. The project tracking, reporting and evaluation will be accomplished for project sponsors including WM in accordance with, among other things, WM requests and the reporting requirements set forth by this FPA and other requirements set forth by VADEQ. The topics tracked, reported and evaluated have been referred to above in Section 5.4 and summarized in Figure 6.
Project Tracking, Reporting and Evaluation. The project tracking, reporting and evaluation will be accomplished for the project in accord with this FPA (see Section III. G. Monitoring, Reporting, Accountability, and Evaluation of Methods to be Used). The County may provide periodic updates of project performance at nationally recognized solid waste symposiums, subject to acceptance by those symposia.
Project Tracking, Reporting and Evaluation. Milestones have been identified in the project management plan. These milestones are closely correlated with the previously identified elements. NASA will work with representatives from the NMED Bureaus to ensure a timely completion of this project. In the event certain elements are not completed as specified, NASA will continue the current system of written deliverables as specified by regulation, permits, and associated documentation.
Project Tracking, Reporting and Evaluation. The project tracking, reporting and evaluation will be accomplished for project sponsors including EPA in accordance with, among other things, EPA requests. The County agrees to provide data to EPA and EPA has agreed to post this information on the EPA’s web page. County will also make data from project available through publishing in professional journals and magazines. The County will prepare semi-annual reports which will include all monitoring data commencing with the execution of the Final Project Agreement and deliver them to USEPA and the stakeholders. An annual meeting will be held to review the project progress and results to date for as long as Yolo County continues to add liquid and/or recirculate leachate at its site under the provisions of the site specific rule(s) promulgated to implement this XL project.
Project Tracking, Reporting and Evaluation. For the copper metallization process, IBM will analyze the plating bath and rinsewaters generated from the copper metallization process. IBM will continue to handle and dispose of the spent plating bath in accordance with existing regulations, and acknowledges that the spent plating bath solutions are not part of this XL Project. As discussed more fully below, IBM will verify that the plating bath and rinsewaters do not contain any concentrations of materials that might otherwise cause the rinsewater and resulting sludge to be categorized as hazardous, including those that are listed in 40 CFR 261 Appendix VII as the basis for the F006 listing. In order for IBM to maintain this exemption, IBM will collect, analyze, and submit data on the plating bath and rinsewaters for the copper metallization project two times per year. IBM expects that there will be a total of between six and ten copper metallization tools operating through the end of the XL project. These results will be submitted to the EPA, VTDEC, and published on EPA’s website at xxx.xxx.xxx/xxxxxxxxx for the duration of the project. The submissions will be by January 15 and July 15 of each year. The analysis will be conducted to measure for the presence of volatiles, semi-volatiles and metals using the methods specified in 40 CFR 264 Appendix IX. In addition, since copper is not listed as a constituent of concern in the basis for the F006 listing, but is a parameter specified in IBM’s existing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, IBM will continue to monitor copper concentrations in its wastewater effluent for conformance with this permit. IBM expects that, under full production, the loadings from the plating and mechanical polishing processes will result in copper effluent concentrations less than 40% of the NPDES permit limit. IBM will seek to keep the copper concentrations below 50% of its permit limit for the duration of the project recognizing that changes in other process steps, treatment performance, and other unforseen circumstances may affect IBM’s ability to meet this objective. In all cases, IBM will operate its wastewater treatment systems to maintain compliance with the NPDES permit requirements. For the global warming gas reductions IBM will track C2F6 usage and estimate the reduction in emissions based on the reduction in chemical usage. IBM will use conversion rates of C2F6 in the clean steps provided by Sematech to estimate emissions from gas usage. Semat...
