Proposed Engineering Features Sample Clauses

Proposed Engineering Features. SR-11 would be constructed as a four-lane toll highway. The proposed typical cross section includes four standard width 12-foot main lanes, 10-foot left and right shoulders, and a median varying in width between 22‟ to 62‟ (see Attachment A.) The highway width is most constrained east of the proposed Sanyo Avenue undercrossing, where existing buildings are near the proposed right-of-way in order to minimize impacts to nearby buildings. The proposed 62-foot median width in the eastern portion of SR-11 is intended to make SR-11 adaptable for potential safety and security needs, and to provide the flexibility to construct additional lanes on approach to the XXX, if these are found to be necessary to meet future vehicle inspection requirements. This additional right-of-way would help ensure access to the new XXX by emergency responders, facilitate evacuation of the XXX if necessary, or allow southbound traffic to be turned around if the XXX had to be closed for emergency security concerns. The SR-11 corridor would be located approximately midway between Otay Mesa Road and Airway Road for most of its length, and would cross four local existing and planned surface streets: Sanyo Avenue, Xxxxxx Xxxxx Drive, Alta Road, and Siempre Viva Road. The highway would extend east from the vicinity of Harvest Road, at the future SR- 905/SR-125 Interchange, for approximately 1.4 miles before curving to the southeast near Alta Road and continuing on to connect with the proposed XXX. The total highway length would be approximately 2.8 miles. East of Sanyo Avenue, SR-11 would be supported on each side by retaining walls in order to minimize impact to adjacent developed parcels. These walls vary in height between 15 and 30 feet. The proposed retaining walls are similar to those originally approved with the SR-905 project but would be located to accommodate the cross-section for SR-11 as part of the Preferred Alternative. Concrete barrier (type 736) would be placed at the top of the retaining walls along each side of the roadway in the Sanyo Avenue area, and an additional concrete barrier would extend along the median (type 60). Proposed limits of grading and rights-of-way are expected to be up to 500 feet wide, with the exception of the interchange locations, which require additional area. These limits would include all required cut/fill slopes, new concrete and asphalt pavement, as well as project-related drainage facilities, lighting, signage, pavement delineation, fencing, ut...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Proposed Engineering Features. The Build Alternative would include the following features, as shown in Attachment B. • Addition of a new continuous access HOV/express lane in both the southbound and northbound directions of I-680 from SR 84 to Alcosta Boulevard; • Installation of electronic tolling equipment and signage; • Widening/reconstruction of pavement in the median and outside to accommodate the HOV/express lanes; • Widening or modification of bridge structures to accommodate freeway widening; and • New and replacement median concrete barriers, retaining walls and sound walls. For regional consistency, the HOV/express lanes will include a continuous access type, allowing vehicles to access HOV/express lanes from adjacent mixed-flow (general purpose) lane throughout the limits of the facility. During the hours of operation, drivers of SOVs can choose to use the HOV/express lanes for a fee. All eligible HOVs as authorized by the Federal and State statutes (including motorcycles, buses, and eligible clean air vehicles as authorized by the California Air Resources Board) would be able to access the HOV/express lane during the hours of operation. Depending on the operational business rules, these vehicles may travel fee-free or may incur a reduced fee. The Bay Area Managed Lanes Committee, composed of Caltrans, MTC, and California Highway Patrol (CHP) staff, will decide hours of operations of the HOV/express lanes. Outside of the hours of operation, the HOV/express lanes would be operated as general purpose lanes, open to all users for no toll. Complete Streets Program would not be applicable as this project includes addition of express lanes exclusive to I-680 and improvements to local streets are not proposed.
Proposed Engineering Features. The project is a CAPM project that will cold plane the existing pavement and replace it with RHMA-O and RHMA-G. The existing mainline traveled way, shoulders, and on-/off-ramps on SR 4 will be ground and resurfaced to extend the service life of the pavement structure and provide smoother ride quality. Pavement delineation will be upgraded to current standards. The project will also upgrade roadside signs and overhead sign panels along the mainline and ramps. Curb ramps within the project limits will be repaired and upgraded to be ADA compliant. The project will also repair and replace culverts that are in poor condition, replace dikes, and upgrade metal beam guardrail to Midwest guardrail system (MGS). The project will upgrade the drainage features (culverts and flared-end sections) within the project limits. The final list of locations will be determined during the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) phase. The project will also repair roadside embankment failure at specific locations within the project limits. See the Preliminary Layout Sheets in Attachment B. In addition, the project will improve pavement striping to include high-visibility crosswalks and advanced yield lines at uncontrolled pedestrian crossings and pavement delineation on the SR 4 mainline and ramps. To comply with Complete Streets needs for pedestrians and bicyclists, during the PS&E phase, the District Division of Design will consult with District Office of Traffic Safety and the District Pedestrian and Bicycle Coordinator to implement the required upgrades for pedestrians and bicyclists within the project limits.
Proposed Engineering Features. Common Engineering Features of All Build Alternatives (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B) within the freeway/expressway Segment 1 [Proposed Modified SR 219 (Xxxxxxx Avenue)/Xxxxx Road Intersection to Proposed SR 108/Claus Road Intersection] The four Build Alternatives are shown in Figure 1-1 and Attachment C. The western terminus of all alternatives is at the proposed modified signalized SR 219 (Xxxxxxx Avenue)/Xxxxx Road intersection. The alternatives proceed on the same new alignment for approximately 1 mile to SR 108 (XxXxxxx Avenue) as SR 219 multi-lane expressway, transitioning from the SR 219 conventional highway to the west to the SR 108 freeway to the east. The new aligned roadway continues for all alternatives for approximately four miles as SR 108 multi-lane freeway/expressway and has similar impacts to the vicinity of the proposed signalized SR 108/Claus Road intersection, which is near the southeast portion of Riverbank. The proposed signalized SR 108/Claus Road intersection provides a transition between the SR 108 freeway to the west and the urban/rural expressway in Segment 2 east of Claus Road. In addition to the intersections at each end of Segment 1 within the urban freeway segment, four single point interchanges (IC), each with two on- ramps and two off-ramps, are proposed at the realigned SR 219/SR 108 (XxXxxxx Avenue)/SR 108 Freeway Separation, SR 108/Coffee Road Undercrossing, SR 108/Oakdale Road Undercrossing, and at the SR 108/Roselle Avenue Undercrossing. No private driveways are proposed along this segment of new roadway; therefore, in order to maintain access to the new facility via the proposed four interchanges and two intersections from adjacent parcels, new and realigned local access roads will be included as part of the proposed project. Bike and pedestrian access is planned to be prohibited within this segment of new roadway as the local roadway network has sufficient existing and planned bike and pedestrian facilities, including but not limited to, along Xxxxxxx Avenue, Xxxxxxxx Road and canals. Bikes and pedestrians would be accommodated through the proposed interchanges and ramp intersections along the local crossing roads. Furthermore, three separate locations are proposed for separated-grade structures at SR108/MID Lateral #6 Canal Undercrossing, SR 108/MID Main Canal Undercrossing and SR 108/BNSF Railroad/Terminal Avenue Overhead. Proposed local access roads and separated-grade structures are shown in Attachment C and Attachment D. Commo...
Proposed Engineering Features. The preferred alternative includes about 17-miles of Managed Lanes in each direction (34 lane miles in total). The preferred alternative minimizes outside pavement improvements by constructing into the median and narrowing the inside shoulders where needed to maintain standard outside shoulder widths except at existing bridges. Narrow outside shoulders are proposed for the Sacramento River Viaduct (aka Pioneer Bridge), Lake Washington Overhead, and Sacramento River Bridge Overhead (Bryte Bend Bridge) as widening these structures would not be feasible due to high costs, environmental and right of way impacts. The proposed median construction and cold planing and paving of the existing pavement, a thickness of 0.3-feet, will occur from Yolo 80 PM 0.0 to 4. 1. The project proposes to restripe the existing roadway from Yolo PM 4.1 to the east, extending into Sacramento County on both US 50 and I-80, to construct the HOT 3+ lanes in each direction.

Related to Proposed Engineering Features

  • Geotechnical Engineer « »« » « » « » « » « »

  • Reverse Engineering The Customer must not reverse assemble or reverse compile or directly or indirectly allow or cause a third party to reverse assemble or reverse compile the whole or any part of the software or any products supplied as a part of the Licensed System.

  • Engineering Forest Service completed survey and design for Specified Roads prior to timber sale advertisement, unless otherwise shown in A8 or Purchaser survey and design are specified in A7. On those roads for which Forest Service completes the design during the contract, the design quantities shall be used as the basis for revising estimated costs stated in the Schedule of Items and adjusting Timber Sale Account. (a) A7 to show Purchaser’s performance responsibility. (b) The Schedule of Items to include costs of survey and design, as provided under B5.24, and adjust Timber Sale Account, as provided in B5.

  • Value Engineering The Supplier may prepare, at its own cost, a value engineering proposal at any time during the performance of the contract. The value engineering proposal shall, at a minimum, include the following; a) the proposed change(s), and a description of the difference to the existing contract requirements; b) a full cost/benefit analysis of the proposed change(s) including a description and estimate of costs (including life cycle costs) the Procuring Entity may incur in implementing the value engineering proposal; and c) a description of any effect(s) of the change on performance/functionality.

  • Engineering Report Lender shall have received a current Engineering Report with respect to the Property, which report shall be in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Lender.

  • Architect/Engineer (A/E) means a person registered as an architect pursuant to Tex. Occ. Code Xxx., Chapter 1051, as a landscape architect pursuant to Tex. Occ. Code Xxx., Chapter 1052, a person licensed as a professional engineer pursuant to Tex. Occ. Code Xxx., Chapter 1001 and/or a firm employed by Owner or a design-build contractor to provide professional architectural or engineering services and to exercise overall responsibility for the design of a Project or a significant portion thereof, and to perform the contract administration responsibilities set forth in the Contract.

  • Design Development An interim step in the design process. Design Development documents consist of plans, elevations, and other drawings and outline specifications. These documents will fix and illustrate the size and character of the entire project in its essentials as to kinds of materials, type of structure, grade elevations, sidewalks, utilities, roads, parking areas, mechanical and electrical systems, and such other work as may be required.

  • Engineering Reports (a) Not less than 30 days prior to each Scheduled Borrowing Base Redetermination Date, commencing with the Scheduled Borrowing Base Redetermination to occur on or around March 15, 2007, the Borrower shall furnish to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders a Reserve Report. The Reserve Reports delivered in connection with each March 15 Scheduled Borrowing Base Redetermination, commencing March 15, 2007, shall be prepared by certified independent petroleum engineers or other independent petroleum consultant(s) acceptable to the Administrative Agent. The Reserve Reports delivered in connection with each September 15 Scheduled Borrowing Base Redetermination, commencing September 15, 2007, shall be prepared by or under the supervision of the chief engineer of the Borrower and a Responsible Officer shall certify such Reserve Report to be true and accurate and to have been prepared in accordance with the procedures used in the immediately preceding Scheduled Borrowing Base Redetermination Reserve Report. (b) In the event of an unscheduled redetermination, the Borrower shall furnish to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders a Reserve Report prepared by or under the supervision of the chief engineer of the Obligors together with the certificate of a Responsible Officer who shall certify such Reserve Report to be true and accurate and to have been prepared in accordance with the procedures used in the immediately preceding Reserve Report. For any unscheduled redetermination requested by the Lenders or the Borrower pursuant to Section 2.08(d), the Borrower shall provide such Reserve Report with an “as of” date as required by the Lenders as soon as possible, but in any event no later than 30 days following the receipt of the request by the Administrative Agent. (c) With the delivery of each Reserve Report, the Borrower shall provide, or cause to be provided, to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders, a certificate from a Responsible Officer certifying that, to the best of his knowledge and in all material respects: (i) the information contained in the Reserve Report and any other information delivered in connection therewith is true and correct, (ii) the Obligors and the Partnerships own good and marketable title to the Oil and Gas Properties evaluated in such Reserve Report and such Properties are free of all Liens except for Liens permitted by Section 9.03, (iii) except as set forth on an exhibit to the certificate, on a net basis there are no gas imbalances, take or pay or other prepayments with respect to its Oil and Gas Properties evaluated in such Reserve Report which would require any Obligor to deliver Hydrocarbons produced from such Oil and Gas Properties at some future time without then or thereafter receiving full payment therefor, (iv) none of Obligor’s or and the Partnerships’ Oil and Gas Properties have been sold since the date of the last Borrowing Base determination except as set forth on an exhibit to the certificate, which certificate shall list all of its Oil and Gas Properties sold and in such detail as reasonably required by the Administrative Agent, (v) attached to the certificate is a list of its Oil and Gas Properties added to and deleted from the immediately prior Reserve Report and a list showing any change in working interest or net revenue interest in its Oil and Gas Properties occurring and the reason for such change, (vi) attached to the certificate is a list of all Persons disbursing proceeds to the Obligors from their Oil and Gas Properties, and (vii) all of the Oil and Gas Properties evaluated by such Reserve Report are Mortgaged Property except as set forth on a schedule attached to the certificate.

  • Training Materials Training Materials will be provided for each student. Training Materials may be used only for either (i) the individual student’s reference during Boeing provided training and for review thereafter or (ii) Customer’s provision of training to individuals directly employed by the Customer.

  • Engineering Services Definition: Engineering Services includes any service or creative work, the adequate performance of which requires education, training and experience in the application of special knowledge in consulting, investigating, evaluating, planning and designing, engineering principles. Engineering Services covered by the Xxxxxx Architect-Engineers Act (40 U.S.C. 1102) are not covered in the primary scope of OASIS SB. Examples: Service areas that are included under the Engineering Services discipline include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Systems Engineering 2. Advanced Technology Pilots and Trials 3. Alternative Energy Sources and Engineering 4. Configuration Management 5. Concept Development

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!