Category Two. Design, construct, and/or program audio visual systems. This may include, but are not limited to: • Conduct site visits to determine the scope of the projects. • Formulate a plan of action together with the stakeholders. • As the design evolves, continue to communicate with the stakeholders to keep them apprised of the progress and report updates. • Determine what equipment needs to be replaced and what can be re-used. • Make drawings and write specifications for all assigned work. • Provide project budget estimates. • Prepare a bid package that meets the requirements of the Judicial Council of California. • Evaluate the bids and advise which contractor(s) are most qualified to perform the work. • Evaluate change orders for both financial, technical and functional issues, in cases where unforeseen issues are discovered during installation or construction. • Perform a punch list at project completion. • If required, do a post-completion do a post-completion evaluation to confirm that systems are operating per design. • Consultant may NOT bid on any construction work they have recommended. (No Follow On). • JBE reserves the right to require logical diagrams illustrating proposed solution as part of the quote package. • Procure, furnish, and install audiovisual systems included in design. • Program the installed systems to work with the facility infrastructure. operation and maintenance staff including step-by-step written directions for troubleshooting. • Provide training to operation and maintenance staff including step-by-step written directions for troubleshooting. • Provide written warranty for the completed work. The duration of the warranty shall be dependent on the scope and negotiated at the time of bid proposals for specific projects. • Conduct service visits as needed during the warranty period. • Evaluate change orders for both financial, technical, and functional issues, in cases where unforeseen issues are discovered during installation or construction. • Perform a punch list at project completion. • If required, conduct a post-completion evaluation to confirm that systems are operating per design. • JBE reserves the right to require logical diagrams illustrating proposed solution as part of the quote package. • For AV control system design, obtain a template for the touch panel, if available, either from the JBE or the Judicial Council and base the final design on that template. • Start work as soon as the design is approved by the hiring entit...
Category Two. An allegation that, with respect only to those University policies, agreements, administrative decisions, or Regulations which affect mandatorily negotiable terms and conditions of employment, there has been a misrepresentation, misapplication or violation of such a University policy, agreement, administrative decision, or Regulation which has affected mandatorily negotiable terms and conditions of employment of a member or members of the bargaining unit. An allegation that, with respect only to those University policies, agreements, administrative decisions, or Regulations which are not mandatorily negotiable but which intimately and directly affect the work and welfare of members of the bargaining unit, there has been a misrepresentation, misapplication or violation of such a University policy, agreement, administrative decision, or Regulation which has intimately, directly, and negatively affected the work and welfare of members of the bargaining unit. Also included in Category Two are allegations concerning any matter which is mandated by law to be a subject of a grievance procedure of the Agreement, such as grievances concerning allegations of unjust discipline,3 and which has not been provided for under Category One.
Category Two. Program participants who join the program after June 1st and who remain active participants through August 31st of each Program year (denoted DCUPT).
Category Two. 3.1.2.1 The second category of streamlined review would apply to transactions that may be subject to CEQA (unlike the first category) but would not require environmental review by the CPUC because the Conservation Activities are either too speculative or too unspecific to allow meaningful environmental review by the CPUC at this time, and subsequent local discretionary review will assure subsequent CEQA compliance at a more appropriate time when actions have been adequately defined and proposed by the applicant. Examples of activities that are too speculative or unspecific to allow meaningful CPUC review may include:
3.1.2.1 For the purpose of these examples, “too speculative or unspecific to allow meaningful CPUC review” means that Conservation Activities included in a particular transaction would simply be stated as a general objective. Characteristically, such activities would likely be planned for many years into the future or would not include a specific timeframe for implementation, and would not define specific location or design of planned improvements nor address the number of potential users, etc.
Category Two. 3.1.2.1 The second category of streamlined review would apply to transactions that may be subject to CEQA (unlike the first category) but would not require environmental review by the CPUC because the Conservation Activities are either too speculative or too unspecific to allow meaningful environmental review by the CPUC at this time, and subsequent local discretionary review will assure subsequent CEQA compliance at a more appropriate time when actions have been adequately defined and proposed by the applicant. Examples of activities that are too speculative or unspecific to allow meaningful CPUC review may include: · Unspecific future Conservation Activity of redeveloping a campground as a river-side day use site in cooperation with USFWS · Unspecific future Conservation Activity of creating a viewing platform/boardwalk and viewing blind · Unspecific future Conservation Activity of creating an ADA fishing platform and access point · Unspecific future Conservation Activity of creating expanded hiking trails to connect nearby lakes
3.1.2.1 For the purpose of these examples, "too speculative or unspecific to allow meaningful CPUC review" means that Conservation Activities included in a particular transaction would simply be stated as a general objective. Characteristically, such activities would likely be planned for many years into the future or would not include a specific timeframe for implementation, and would not define specific location or design of planned improvements nor address the number of potential users, etc.
3.1.2.3 Category 2 would also apply to proposed Conservation Activities that have already been reviewed under CEQA, consistent with G.O. 131-D practice. Examples of activities where CEQA review has already been performed may include: · Development of a hiking trail that is part of a trail system that has already undergone CEQA review by another agency · Development of recreational facilities that are part of a larger project that has already undergone CEQA review by another agency
3.1.2.4 Prior to transferring an interest in any Conservation Property, PG&E shall submit a simplified Advice Letter to the Commission that would include the following five items of information (and for each parcel, where multiple transactions are bundled in a single Advice Letter):
(1) Identification of Conservation Property parcel(s);
(2) Type of property interest disposition;
(3) Legal name and location of receiving party6;
(4) Potential use(s) and conservati...
Category Two. An allegation that, with respect only to those University policies, agreements, administrative decisions, or Regulations which affect mandatorily negotiable terms and conditions of employment, there has been a misrepresentation, misapplication or violation of such a University policy, agreement, administrative decision, or Regulation which has affected mandatorily negotiable terms and conditions of employment of a member or members of the bargaining unit. An allegation that, with respect only to those University policies, agreements, administrative decisions, or Regulations which are not mandatorily negotiable but which intimately and directly affect the work and welfare of members of the bargaining unit, there has been a misrepresentation, misapplication or violation of such a University policy, agreement, administrative decision, or Regulation which has intimately, directly, and negatively affected the work and welfare of members of the bargaining unit. Also included in Category Two are allegations concerning any matter which is mandated by law to be a subject of a grievance procedure of the Agreement, such as grievances concerning allegations of unjust discipline,1 and which has not been provided for under Category One. Also included in Category Two are allegations of harassment of a member of the bargaining unit. Harassment is intentional persistent or repeated differential treatment, without reasonable cause, that negatively and directly affects the work and welfare of a member of the bargaining unit.
Category Two. Any employee, hired on or before June 30, 2002, who is, as of June 30, 2002, regularly scheduled to work between twenty (20) hours per week and twenty-four (24) hours per week and is, as of June 30, 2002, enrolled in the below described insurance plan and remains continuously enrolled shall continue to be eligible for insurance (along with enrolled dependents).
Category Two. Internal connec- tions, basic maintenance and managed internal broadband services as defined in § 54.500 and described in the Eligible Services List are category two sup- ported services.
Category Two. Non-Regular Duty - Special Assignments. "Public events that require additional m anpower during the MOU year." Examples are, but are not necessarily limited to the C ounty Fair, contract assignments, and VIP Security assignments. The County will solicit the transmittal of Overtime Request Forms in January and July of each calendar year. A roster will be compiled relative to specific overtime events. The request forms shall include the specific event for which the employee is volunteering. Persons delegated the administrative responsibility for each event shall be provided with the personnel roster, relative to the event, for equitable distribution of available overtime assignments. An employee who is deemed to be unavailable for the assignment shall be removed from the top of the roster and placed at the bottom for later consideration and to promote equitable distribution.
Category Two. The survivor shall receive the amount of $150,000, if paragraph (1) applies to the employee and the Secretary also determines that there was an aggregate period of not less than 10 years, before the employee attained normal retirement age (for purposes of the Social Security Act), during which, as the result of any covered illness contracted by that employee through exposure to a toxic substance at a Depart- ment of Energy facility, the employee’s annual wage did not exceed 50 percent of the average annual wage of that employee, as determined under section 3673(a)(2)(A)(ii).
