Identification of Historic Properties. A. The City shall define the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for each undertaking and identify historic properties within the APE that may be affected by the project. The APE means the geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause changes in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist. The APE is influenced by the scale and nature of an undertaking and may be different for different kinds of effects caused by the undertaking (see 36 C.F.R § 800. 16[d] for further guidance).
Identification of Historic Properties. The BLM shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to identify cultural resources in the APE. The BLM will determine if any of the cultural resources identified within the APE, including resources with religious and cultural significance to a Tribe or Tribal Organization, meets one or more of the eligibility criteria for the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) specified in 36 CFR 60.4. Resources that meet one or more criteria shall be considered historic properties. The BLM will carry out identification efforts for this Undertaking in phases, which may be completed or undertaken concurrently. To the extent that the phases require formalized documentation of process or have a specific timeline for completion, the BLM will incorporate the tasks as part of the Historic Properties Management Plan (HPMP). The phases of the Agreement are described as follows:
Identification of Historic Properties. 1. The signatories to this Agreement along with the concurring tribes agree that the Authority will identify historic properties and prepare documentation in accordance with Attachment C. As appropriate, these methods may be modified for undertaking-specific needs in consultation with the signatories and in accordance with QI review and current professional standards. Findings shall be made by the Authority to the FRA based on National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) criteria (36 CFR 60.4) and evaluated in accordance with provisions of 36 CFR §800.4(c). Evaluation methods and criteria shall be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Evaluation (48 Federal Register 44729-44738) (36 CFR §63) and shall be completed by QIs qualified in the appropriate discipline: archaeology, architectural history, or history.
Identification of Historic Properties. The facility is: - Younger than 45 years of age (provide construction date) -- Unevaluated, no additional survey/investigation needed -- Unevaluated, additional survey/investigation needed - Older than 45 years of age (provide construction date) -- Unevaluated, no additional survey/investigation needed -- Unevaluated, additional survey/investigation needed -Not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) --Provide determination date, previous surveys/investigations, brief justification, and any SHPO/THPO or Tribal comments -Eligible for listing on the NRHP --Provide determination date, previous surveys/investigations, SHPO concurrence information, NRHP criteria/criterion, and brief integrity statement -Listed in the NRHP --Provide listing date, NRHP criteria/criterion and brief integrity statement -Listed as a National Historic Landmark --Provide listing date and brief integrity statement - Known historic properties within the defined visual APE --Provide list and distance from facility - Known archeological site within the defined APE --Provide list - Known properties of traditional religious and cultural significance, including seeds or plants of cultural significance, to a Tribe within the defined direct and visual APE --Provide name, distance from facility, and Tribal consultation history/efforts
Identification of Historic Properties. The facility is: -Unevaluated -Not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) -Eligible for listing on the NRHP --Provide NRHP criteria/criterion and brief integrity statement -Listed on the NRHP --Provide listing date, NRHP criteria/criterion and brief integrity statement -Listed as a National Historic Landmark --Provide listing date and brief integrity statement - Known historic properties within the defined visual APE - Known archeological site within the defined APE - Known properties of traditional religious and cultural significance to a Tribe within the defined APE
Identification of Historic Properties. A. The City shall review all existing information on any property within the APE that may be affected by the use of these funds, including the National Register of Historic Places and lists of Historic Properties maintained by the City of Berkeley.
Identification of Historic Properties. In planning for the Undertaking, the Department of Defense (DoD) has conducted extensive archaeological and architectural surveys and evaluations, and, in consultation with the Guam State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), National Park Service (NPS) and some Concurring Parties, we have applied the results to the siting/lay down of individual projects to avoid and minimize effects to historic properties. DoD has The posting of this PA Memo on the Cultural Resources Information (CRI) website is required by Stipulation IV.E.2. of the 2011 Military Relocation PA as a means for interested members of the public to provide comments on the identification and evaluation of historic properties. Confidentiality requirements under the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) prohibit federal agencies from publicly disclosing the exact nature and location of archaeological sites and other types of historic properties such as traditional cultural properties (TCPs). provided documentation of these efforts to the Signatories and Invited Signatories via Appendices D and E of the Programmatic Agreement (PA). DoD surveys and evaluations have focused on project-specific APEs, defined consistent with 36 CFR §800.16(d) to include those portions of the island of Guam and Tinian subject to direct and indirect effects of projects included in the Undertaking, based on the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). In addition to the archaeological and architectural surveys and evaluations, DoD has completed extensive archival research and oral history studies and interviews to identify traditional cultural properties, places, sacred sites, and culturally important natural resources such as the xxxxx xxxx, nunu, da’ok, dukduk, and ifit trees, and medicinal plants. More specifically, the J-006 project footprint was included in one or more of the following studies of cultural and/or historic resources conducted in support of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) by the DoD beginning in 2007: Xxxxxx, X. Stephen 2009 Archaeological Surveys and Cultural Resources Studies on Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Support of the Joint Guam Build-Up Environmental Impact Statement, Volume I: Guam. Prepared for Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Contract N62742-06-D-1870, Task Order 07. Xxxxx, Xxxx, Xxx X...
Identification of Historic Properties. 1. An ADOT CRP shall determine and document the APE for undertakings covered by this Agreement in accordance with Attachment 4 (Defining the Area of Potential Effects). In establishing the APE, both the direct and indirect effects shall be considered. At any time, ADOT may communicate with SHPO or other consulting parties to the undertaking on determining and documenting an APE.
Identification of Historic Properties. A. TDA shall ensure that the Area of Potential Effect (APE) is established by the Responsible Entity in consultation with the SHPO. The APE shall include the footprint to be directly affected by new construction, staging areas, and access areas with regard to the identification of archeological sites. A broader APE to include the indirect APE, will be required to assess specific undertakings that have the potential for visual effects on nearby architectural properties.
Identification of Historic Properties. A. ONGOING IDENTIFICATION EFFORTS
