Identification of Historic Properties. 1. The signatories to this Agreement along with the concurring tribes agree that the Authority will identify historic properties and prepare documentation in accordance with Attachment C. As appropriate, these methods may be modified for undertaking-specific needs in consultation with the signatories and in accordance with QI review and current professional standards. Findings shall be made by the Authority to the FRA based on National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) criteria (36 CFR 60.4) and evaluated in accordance with provisions of 36 CFR §800.4(c). Evaluation methods and criteria shall be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Evaluation (48 Federal Register 44729-44738) (36 CFR §63) and shall be completed by QIs qualified in the appropriate discipline: archaeology, architectural history, or history.
2. Historic properties shall be identified to the extent possible within the APE for each of the nine undertakings that comprise the California HST System and will be documented in the Project EIR/EIS and the Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) as described in Attachment C. The content, methodology, level of effort, and documentation requirements for the HPSR shall follow federal and state guidelines and instructions, and are provided in detail in Attachment C. The identification effort and ineligible properties shall be documented in separate technical reports for archaeological properties and historic architectural properties, the drafts of which will be submitted for review by the signatories and other consulting parties including tribal historic preservation officers (THPOs) and tribal representatives who have expressed an interest in the undertaking.
i. Archaeological properties include prehistoric and historic archaeological sites, properties identified as per 800.4(a)(4), objects and districts. Evaluations shall be made by QIs fully qualified in the discipline of archaeology. Archaeological properties within the APE that are identified by QIs as historic properties or presumed to be historic properties shall be documented in the HPSR. Archaeological properties evaluated as ineligible for the NRHP by QIs shall be documented in Archaeological Survey Reports (ASR). The content, methodology, level of effort, and documentation requirements for the ASR are provided in detail in Attachment C. A list of archaeological resources exempt from evaluation is provided in Attachment D.
ii. Historic architectural propert...
Identification of Historic Properties. The BLM shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to identify cultural resources in the APE. The BLM will determine if any of the cultural resources identified within the APE, including resources with religious and cultural significance to a Tribe or Tribal Organization, meets one or more of the eligibility criteria for the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) specified in 36 CFR 60.4. Resources that meet one or more criteria shall be considered historic properties. The BLM will carry out identification efforts for this Undertaking in phases, which may be completed or undertaken concurrently. To the extent that the phases require formalized documentation of process or have a specific timeline for completion, the BLM will incorporate the tasks as part of the Historic Properties Management Plan (HPMP). The phases of the Agreement are described as follows:
Identification of Historic Properties. In planning for the Undertaking, the Department of Defense (DoD) has conducted extensive archaeological and architectural surveys and evaluations, and, in consultation with the Guam State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), National Park Service (NPS) and some Concurring Parties, we have applied the results to the siting/lay down of individual projects to avoid and minimize effects to historic properties. DoD has The posting of this PA Memo on the Cultural Resources Information (CRI) website is required by Stipulation IV.E.2. of the 2011 Military Relocation PA as a means for interested members of the public to provide comments on the identification and evaluation of historic properties. Confidentiality requirements under the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) prohibit federal agencies from publicly disclosing the exact nature and location of archaeological sites and other types of historic properties such as traditional cultural properties (TCPs). provided documentation of these efforts to the Signatories and Invited Signatories via Appendices D and E of the Programmatic Agreement (PA). DoD surveys and evaluations have focused on project-specific APEs, defined consistent with 36 CFR §800.16(d) to include those portions of the island of Guam and Tinian subject to direct and indirect effects of projects included in the Undertaking, based on the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). In addition to the archaeological and architectural surveys and evaluations, DoD has completed extensive archival research and oral history studies and interviews to identify traditional cultural properties, places, sacred sites, and culturally important natural resources such as the xxxxx xxxx, nunu, da’ok, dukduk, and ifit trees, and medicinal plants. More specifically, the J-006 project footprint was included in one or more of the following studies of cultural and/or historic resources conducted in support of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) by the DoD beginning in 2007: Xxxxxx, X. Stephen 2009 Archaeological Surveys and Cultural Resources Studies on Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Support of the Joint Guam Build-Up Environmental Impact Statement, Volume I: Guam. Prepared for Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Contract N62742-06-D-1870, Task Order 07. Xxxxx, Xxxx, Xxx X...
Identification of Historic Properties. The facility is: - Younger than 45 years of age (provide construction date) -- Unevaluated, no additional survey/investigation needed -- Unevaluated, additional survey/investigation needed - Older than 45 years of age (provide construction date) -- Unevaluated, no additional survey/investigation needed -- Unevaluated, additional survey/investigation needed -Not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) --Provide determination date, previous surveys/investigations, brief justification, and any SHPO/THPO or Tribal comments -Eligible for listing on the NRHP --Provide determination date, previous surveys/investigations, SHPO concurrence information, NRHP criteria/criterion, and brief integrity statement -Listed in the NRHP --Provide listing date, NRHP criteria/criterion and brief integrity statement -Listed as a National Historic Landmark --Provide listing date and brief integrity statement - Known historic properties within the defined visual APE --Provide list and distance from facility - Known archeological site within the defined APE --Provide list - Known properties of traditional religious and cultural significance, including seeds or plants of cultural significance, to a Tribe within the defined direct and visual APE --Provide name, distance from facility, and Tribal consultation history/efforts
Identification of Historic Properties. A. The City shall review all existing information on any property within the APE that may be affected by the use of these funds, including the National Register of Historic Places and lists of Historic Properties maintained by the City of Berkeley.
1. If the property proposed for rehabilitation is listed in the National Register or has already been determined eligible for inclusion in the National Register, the City shall proceed with the review of the project pursuant to Stipulation VII, unless exempted under Stipulation IV.
2. If the property has been determined by the City, in written consultation with the SHPO, within the last five (5) years prior to the current Undertaking to be ineligible for inclusion in the National Register, then the Undertaking may proceed without further review under the terms of this PA.
B. If the property proposed for rehabilitation is not listed in the National Register, has not been evaluated for the National Register eligibility within the last five (5) years, and is at least 50 years of age, then the City shall submit the documentation required pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4 plus a completed California Historic Resources Inventory form (DPR523) to the SHPO for review. Other information may be requested by the SHPO if necessary. The City shall apply the National Register Criteria and notify the SHPO of its determination in the submittal.
1. If the SHPO agrees with the City that a property is eligible under the criteria, the property shall be considered eligible for the National Register for purposes of this PA, and shall hereinafter be referred to as a Historic Property. The City shall continue consultation in accordance with the terms of this PA for all such properties.
2. If the SHPO agrees with the City that the criteria are not met, the property shall be considered ineligible for the inclusion in the National Register for a period of five (5) years from the date of the SHPO’s review. Such properties need not be reevaluated during this five (5) year period, unless a party to this PA notifies the City in writing of changing perceptions of significance warrants a property reevaluation. Such properties require no further review under this PA.
3. If the SHPO disagrees with the City’s determination regarding eligibility, the City shall consult further with the SHPO to reach agreement. If agreement cannot be reached, the City shall obtain a final determination from the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the applicable National Pa...
Identification of Historic Properties. 1. An ADOT CRP shall determine and document the APE for undertakings covered by this Agreement in accordance with Attachment 4 (Defining the Area of Potential Effects). In establishing the APE, both the direct and indirect effects shall be considered. At any time, ADOT may communicate with SHPO or other consulting parties to the undertaking on determining and documenting an APE.
2. ADOT shall identify the consulting parties to the undertaking and FHWA will invite them to participate in the Section 106 review in accordance with 36 CFR § 800.2(c) and 36 CFR §§ 800.3(c) through (f). An ADOT CRP will prepare or oversee preparation of invitation letters to the consulting parties. FHWA will review the invitation letters and send out the letters on FHWA letterhead upon approval.
3. ADOT, on behalf of FHWA, shall identify historic properties that may be located within an undertaking’s APE in accordance with 36 CFR §§ 800.4(a)(2) through (4) and 36 CFR § 800.4(b). An ADOT CRP will determine whether a new survey is appropriate. If a survey is required, ADOT will arrange for a survey to be conducted by a professional meeting the applicable qualification standards in Stipulation IV.
4. If a new survey identifies cultural resources within the APE, FHWA, with ADOT’s assistance, will ensure that a survey report meeting current SHPO and ASM reporting standards is prepared. FHWA, or ADOT on behalf of FHWA, will submit the survey report to the consulting parties for a 30 calendar day review, along with National Register eligibility determinations, in accordance with Stipulation X.E.
5. If a new survey is conducted and no cultural resources are identified within the APE, FHWA, with ADOT’s assistance, will ensure that a survey report meeting current SHPO and ASM reporting standards is prepared documenting the negative findings. If the survey was conducted on Tribal or federal land, FHWA or ADOT will consult the appropriate Signatory Tribe or agency regarding the adequacy of the report. Once the report is found adequate by ADOT and the land owner, if any, FHWA shall issue a finding of No Historic Properties Affected, in accordance with Stipulation X.F.1. No further consultation will be required.
6. Identification of historic properties shall be consistent with the SOI’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation (48 FR 44720-26). If the Program-funded undertaking is on land owned or managed by a federal or state land managing agency or Signatory Tribe, ...
Identification of Historic Properties. The facility is: -Unevaluated -Not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) -Eligible for listing on the NRHP --Provide NRHP criteria/criterion and brief integrity statement -Listed on the NRHP --Provide listing date, NRHP criteria/criterion and brief integrity statement -Listed as a National Historic Landmark --Provide listing date and brief integrity statement - Known historic properties within the defined visual APE - Known archeological site within the defined APE - Known properties of traditional religious and cultural significance to a Tribe within the defined APE
Identification of Historic Properties. If the City CRD determines that the planned activities are not exempt activities as noted in Stipulation III above, then the following steps shall be taken:
A. When rehabilitation of a property is proposed, CRD staff shall determine and document the proposed project’s area of potential effect (APE) taking into account direct and indirect effects and identify properties within the APE that are fifty (50) years old or older and evaluate their eligibility for listing in the NRHP.
B. For each APE, CRD staff shall identify if the subject property or other properties within the APE are fifty (50) years old or older and evaluate each for eligibility in the NRHP. In making this determination, CRD staff shall consult tax assessor records or previous surveys of historic properties and/or districts, if any.
C. At a minimum, the CRD staff shall maintain a file on the identification and National Register evaluation of each subject property and on other properties within the APE. The file shall include the following data used in the determination:
1. Location map with APE outlined.
2. Interior and exterior building and neighborhood context photographs keyed to a location map provided by the CRD.
3. Information on whether the property and/or district meets the criteria for NRHP inclusion.
4. Information indicating whether the property is contributing or non-contributing as part of a NRHP-eligible historic district, or if it is individually eligible for the NRHP.
D. If the CRD staff determines that no NRHP-eligible or -listed properties are within the APE, the staff shall document it for inclusion in the Annual Report; and the CRD has no further obligations under Section 106. Properties that are determined to be individually listed in or eligible for listing in the NRHP or are contributing elements of a NRHP-listed or eligible historic district shall be subject to further review pursuant to this Agreement (see Stipulation V).
E. The CRD Staff will submit all file documentation to the Preservation Professional for a review of each activity’s compliance with Section 106 regulations.
F. If the Preservation Professional is not able to determine or needs assistance in determining a property’s eligibility for the NRHP, the Preservation Professional shall forward the information listed above in Stipulation IV.C to the SHPO for a thirty (30) day review or, as necessary, obtain a formal determination of eligibility from the Keeper of the NRHP in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4(c...
Identification of Historic Properties. A. TDA shall ensure that the Area of Potential Effect (APE) is established by the Responsible Entity in consultation with the SHPO. The APE shall include the footprint to be directly affected by new construction, staging areas, and access areas with regard to the identification of archeological sites. A broader APE to include the indirect APE, will be required to assess specific undertakings that have the potential for visual effects on nearby architectural properties.
B. Prior to the initiation of construction or maintenance activities, TDA shall ensure that the Responsible Entity makes a reasonable and good faith effort to identify cultural resources located within the direct and indirect APE. These steps may include, but are not limited to, background research, consultation, oral history interviews, sample field investigations, and field survey that meets or exceeds minimum state survey requirements. TDA shall ensure that all archeological work is conducted by a Principal Investigator who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s professional qualifications standards and is also eligible to receive a Texas Antiquities Permit from the Texas Historical Commission (THC).
C. All draft reports shall be submitted to the SHPO for review and comment. The SHPO shall have 30 calendar days upon receipt in which to review the findings and provide a written response to the Responsible Entity. Failure of the SHPO to respond within 30 days of receipt of the finding shall be considered agreement with the finding. Comments received by the Responsible Entity from the SHPO shall be addressed in the final reports. If no cultural resources are identified in the APE, TDA shall ensure that the Responsible Entity documents this finding pursuant to Stipulation III.A.
D. If cultural resources are identified within the APE, TDA shall ensure that the Responsible Entity consults with the SHPO to develop a testing plan to determine eligibility for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in accordance with the process described in 36 CFR 800.4(c) and criteria established in 36 CFR 60. Alternatively, the Responsible Entity may redesign the project to completely avoid all effects on the identified cultural resources (as per Stipulation III. B.). All draft reports of site testing shall be submitted to the SHPO for review and comment. The SHPO shall have 30 calendar days in which to review the findings and provide a written response to the Responsible Entity. Failure of ...
Identification of Historic Properties. A. The City shall define the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for each undertaking and identify historic properties within the APE that may be affected by the project. The APE means the geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause changes in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist. The APE is influenced by the scale and nature of an undertaking and may be different for different kinds of effects caused by the undertaking (see 36 C.F.R § 800. 16[d] for further guidance).
