Joint Secretariat. Al. Grunwaldzka 186 (GARNIZON) 80-266 Gdańsk Poland
Joint Secretariat a. The Programme’s Joint Secretariat (hereinafter referred to as “JS”) has been set up by the MA. The main office of the JS is operated by XX.XX in Rostock/Germany with a branch office in Riga/Latvia hosted by the State Regional Development Agency Republic of Latvia (hereinafter referred to as “SRDA”).
b. In the Programme, the JS will carry out the majority of day-to-day tasks related to the overall Programme implementation, in particular the tasks stipulated in Article 23(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1299/2013. The JS is the central contact point for the public interested in the Programme, potential beneficiaries and selected/running operations.
Joint Secretariat. The collaborative bodies receive administrative support from a joint secretariat for which both parties are responsible and which will be organised in a manner suitable to each party. The secretariat is staffed by people from administrative units within each party and perform their tasks within the scope and from the perspective of the collaborative body. There shall be an RD&E Office at the university hospital to support the entire collaboration organisation by providing the processes and decision-making documentation required. The head of the RD&E Office is appointed by the director of the university hospital after consultation with KI’s president. The position shall be held by an individual holding a combined employment.
Joint Secretariat a) The Parties agree to establish a joint secretariat to support the Management Committee in the administration of this Agreement, including the timely production and sharing of information about Applicants, MCB Applicants, Recipients, Projects, MCB Projects, financial cash flows and other information; and
b) Newfoundland and Labrador agrees to pay the costs of the secretariat and audits pursuant to section 9.2 a) and to provide the location mentioned in subsection 4.3 c), which is subject to reimbursement pursuant to Section 3.1 a) of this Agreement.
Joint Secretariat. (a) Xx. X. X. Xxxxx Representative of ASUU
(b) Dr. M. B. Kuna Representative of ASUU
(c) Xx. X. X. X. Xxxxxx Representative of ASUU
(d) Xxx. Xxx X. Aiyedun Representative of Federal Ministry of Education, Abuja.
(e) Mrs. Q. U. Elebor Representative of Federal Ministry of Education, Abuja. (Retired, 25th August, 2008)
(f) Xx. X. X. Xxxx National Universities Commission, Abuja.
(g) Mrs. C. N. Xxxxx-Xxxxx National Universities Commission, Abuja XXX.XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXX
Joint Secretariat. The managing authority, after consultation with the Member States and any ENI partner country participating in the Programme, shall set up a joint secretariat, as set up in section 5.2 of the Programme.
Joint Secretariat a) The Parties agree to establish a joint secretariat, the “Canada-Yukon Infrastructure Secretariat.” (the “Secretariat”) to support the Management Committee in the administration of this Agreement, including the timely production and sharing of information about Applicants, Projects, financial cash flows and other information; and
b) Yukon agrees to pay the costs of the Secretariat and to provide the location mentioned in subsection 4.3 c).
Joint Secretariat. The Co-Chairs will be supported by a Joint public/private sector Secretariat. The organisations providing the Co-Chairs will normally also support the Secretariat function.
Joint Secretariat. The joint secretariat serves all IFA joint bodies except the wildlife management advisory council (North Slope), whose secretariat is based in Whitehorse. It was established under the Territorial Societies Ordinance in 1986 by agreement between Inuvialuit and the governments of Canada and the Northwest Territories to provide administrative and technical support services. It is administered by an executive director accountable to a board of directors representing the chairs of the bodies it serves. In addition to administering implementation funding for these bodies, it provides them with full-time staff support to assist them in responding to issues, carrying out their activities and sharing information in a co-ordinated manner. It also provides the staff support for the Inuvialuit harvest study. Unlike other comprehensive claims agreements that limit harvest studies to determining basic needs levels, IHS has a much broader application to the work of the co- management bodies, HTC and government agencies. An important requirement is that the harvest information be collected through local HTC and IGC, which guarantees a strong level of harvester involvement in the management process and in improving the information available for hunters and government agencies. The harvest study underscores the importance of independent research and technical support provided to the IFA management regime. In addition to the harvest study, IFA provided for significant funding devoted to a wildlife research program and placed responsibility on governments to improve their state of knowledge of wildlife and habitat in the region in order to meet their obligations within the agreement.5 All decisions of the joint management boards are conveyed by way of recommendations to the appropriate minister. The decisions of the bodies are not final and are subject to ministerial override. However, in practice, no formal recommendation from these institutions has been rejected or ignored. This has been attributed largely to the collaborative relationship that has developed between the parties, in which difficult issues and potential problems are resolved at the board level before a recommendation is made. This approach provides both the ministers and members of the co-management bodies with a satisfactory level of comfort in accepting and implementing board decisions. The most notable prevailing difficulty with the co-management bodies relates to establishing institutional understanding, ...
Joint Secretariat. The Parties agree to establish a Joint Secretariat to support the Oversight Committee in the administration of this Agreement, including the timely production and sharing of information about Applicants, Projects’ financial cash flows and other information.
