We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Review Phase Sample Clauses

Review PhaseActivities and Deliverables/Outputs ‌ The WRMA IV&V Team reviews the current documentation and verifies the perspectives of stakeholders across the organization, allowing the team to monitor and trace the impact of changes and dependencies throughout the development effort. The IV&V team also considers the impact of these changes and provides an impact assessment from both an operational and maintenance perspective. Verification procedures include test performance to exercise a portion, or the entirety, of the system.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review Phase. (a) The Consultants shall commence the Review Phase upon the commencement of this Agreement. (b) The Consultants shall take into account the findings of previous studies / reports / preliminary designs for and related to the Project, and update all related information pertaining to the Project. (c) The Review Phase is deemed completed upon DR’s acceptance of the final Review Report.
Review Phase. 6.2.1 Reviews the work carried out by the consultants for the Investigation and the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Final Report of the Investigation and prepare any alternative proposals which are considered to be more favourable than those recommended. The review shall include the following: (a) The alignment of the proposed water mains. This is required to be the optimum combination of lowest cost, least disruption to marine, vehicular and pedestrian traffic, least inconvenience for the public, least disruption to or greatest ability to phase in with the works of others including other Government departments and any other factors that come to light. (b) The preliminary design for the proposed water mains including the corrosion protection measure for the submarine main and the proposed land main. (c) The monitoring and control (electrical and mechanical) schemes for the proposed works. (d) Geotechnical issues. (e) Land requirements. (f) Interfacing with other projects. (g) Programme for works and for material procurement, and programme constraints. (h) Contract strategy and strategy for site supervision. (i) Materials for pipes, fittings and valves including a review of the maintenance problems associated with those portions of water main to be laid at depths that give a cover of greater than 1.0 m measured from the surface. (j) Cost estimate. 6.2.2 Pursuant to Clause 2.7 to 2.9, the Consultants shall conduct an option evaluation of the most suitable NEC types for the Project and prepare a report, which shall include: (a) assessment and evaluation of different contract types for NEC and identification of the merits and demerits of each contract option; (b) findings and recommendation on the best contract strategy including the choices of the main and secondary options which best suit the Project; (c) the approach and methodology in selecting the best contract strategy and secondary options; (d) any special issues identified in the adoption of the NEC for the Project; and (e) sample NEC contract document which uses the main and secondary options recommended. During the process of option evaluation for the most suitable contract types, the Consultants shall arrange meetings with the Employer to discuss their progress and findings and provide guidance to the Employer to select the best contract type and secondary options. The Consultants shall prepare Working Papers, worksheets, workbooks, relevant references and literature and attend work...
Review Phase. Reviews the work carried out by the consultants for the Investigation and the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Final Report of the Investigation and prepare any alternative proposals which are considered to be more favourable than those recommended. The review shall include the following: The alignment of the proposed water mains. This is required to be the optimum combination of lowest cost, least disruption to marine, vehicular and pedestrian traffic, least inconvenience for the public, least disruption to or greatest ability to phase in with the works of others including other Government departments and any other factors that come to light. The preliminary design for the proposed water mains including the corrosion protection measure for the submarine main and the proposed land main. The monitoring and control (electrical and mechanical) schemes for the proposed works. Geotechnical issues. Land requirements. Interfacing with other projects. Programme for works and for material procurement, and programme constraints. Contract strategy and strategy for site supervision. Materials for pipes, fittings and valves including a review of the maintenance problems associated with those portions of water main to be laid at depths that give a cover of greater than 1.0 m measured from the surface. Cost estimate.
Review Phase. The Subject Matter Experts and all Stakeholders acknowledge the content has been reviewed and approved to move into the County Learning Management System. (Sign-off required before Phase 5 starts)
Review Phase. 6.2.1. The Consultants shall review the existing locations of field equipment according to the requirement in Transport Planning & Design Manual and relevant Traffic and Road Ordinance. 6.2.2. The Consultants shall review the statutory requirements on traffic control signings against the current operation arrangement of the tunnel. The Consultants shall identity if there are any constraints on the TCSS over tunnel management and operation, advise the way forward and liaise with the authorities in case amend to the current Ordinance or Regulations is needed. 6.2.3. The Consultants shall review whether the existing structures (e.g. lane control signal in approach roads) are capable to withstand the additional or new load. 6.2.4. The Consultants shall conduct thorough cable-duct checking as detailed in Clause 4.1(h) and submit a detailed cable-duct survey report with recommendation. 6.2.5. The Consultants shall check the underground utilities as detailed in Clause 4.1(k) by method of bore-holes and trial pits, etc. and obtain the consent from authorities concerned before finalizing the locations of any structures to be constructed or relocated. The Consultants shall consolidate the findings and recommendations into Underground Utilities report. 6.2.6. The Consultants shall provide the requirement on construction of new structures. The Director’s Representative will provide the necessary input on proposed equipment type upon liaison with the Consultants as project progresses. 6.2.7. The Consultants shall review and design adequate provision of advance signings to tunnel area, including the associated design on power supply, data transfer and civil provision works design on existing highway structures. 6.2.8. The Consultants shall liaise with the XXXX project and confirm the latest interface requirement between XXXX and the tunnel TCSS. The interface requirement shall include programme, data format, data type, frequency of update, provision works, etc. 6.2.9. The Consultants shall liaise with the users of the radio rebroadcast and confirm the details of the associated provision including coverage, frequency range, signal strength, bandwidth, management & maintenance arrangement, etc. Constraints, if any, from existing mobile service operators shall be also taken into consideration. 6.2.10. The Consultant shall review the latest user requirements and technologies over tunnel TCSS application. 6.2.11. The Consultant shall review and advise on the needed system & ...
Review Phase. (a) Review the work carried out by the consultants for the Investigation and the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Final Report of the Investigation. Prepare any alternative proposals which are considered to be more favourable than those recommended in the Final Report of the Investigation. (b) Recommend to the Employer to carry out in the Design Stage further surveys, studies, analyses, assessments, inspections and investigations including site investigation in addition to those carried out under the Investigation for the preparation of the detailed design and contractual arrangements for the laying of the proposed submarine water mains and associated land main. (c) Review interfacing with other projects and identify those parts of the proposed works that are required to be carried out in conjunction with the other projects in order to minimize the interfacing problem. (d) Assess and evaluate different contract types for NEC, main and secondary options and contract strategies and recommend to the Employer the best NEC contract arrangement for the Project.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review Phase. 6.6.1 The review shall focus on issues in relation to the Project scope, estimated project cost, project justification, construction options, land requirements, site investigations, surveys, environmental implications, project implementation, project programme, key statutory / administrative / consultative steps, in-principle solutions to the basic engineering aspect for use in the Design Development Phase and Detailed Design Phase and any further assessments / studies required for design development under the Design Development Phase of works contracts. 6.6.2 The specific aspects to be addressed during the review shall include but not limited to the follows: (a) Alignment and programme of interface roadworks projects; (b) Treatment and disposal methods of dredged materials including pre-disposal treatments; (c) Management of construction and demolition (C&D) materials, including on-site sorting / crushing / recycling of inert C&D materials, on-site reuse of sorted / recycled inert C&D materials (e.g. as concrete aggregates or granular bedding materials or seawall rubbles / armour stones, etc), temporary stockpiling and / or off-site disposal of non-inert and also inert C&D materials; and (d) Programme and practicability of the implementation proposals including contract forms. 6.6.3 The Consultants shall take into consideration the short timeframe available for seeking additional information from respective parties and therefore should take timely actions for completing the Review Phase. Where additional information is not timely available, the Consultants shall review the works packages / contracts / elements of the Project by coming up with their own proposals and recommendations which are to be further developed under the Design development Phase of works contracts. 6.6.4 The Consultants shall identify any requirements on reprovisioning and entrustment works as a result of the Project works and assist in negotiations with the concerned parties and drafting of entrustment agreements. 6.6.5 The Consultants shall also, having regard to the findings and recommendations in Clauses 6.6.1 to 6.6.4 as well as the interfacing issues in Clauses 6.5.16 and 6.5.17 of this Brief, also identify and propose strategies / solutions for the following: (a) Timely relocation of the existing utilities affected by the Project; (b) All critical issues and constraints which affect the construction sequence and programme of the Project; (c) Phasing and packages for implementat...

Related to Review Phase

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Review Periods Owner shall have up to ten (10) Business Days from its receipt of the documents listed in Sections 1.3 and 1.4 above, to issue to Contractor written comments on such documents, Drawings and Specifications. The Owner’s approval rights only apply to documents listed in Section 1.3. If comments are not received for items listed in Section 1.3 in ten (10) Business Days, the Contractor may proceed with the development of the Drawings and Specifications with the design reflected in the uncommented document. Owner will annotate the Drawings and Specifications as appropriate and return to Contractor. In the event that Owner disapproves the Drawings or Specifications, Owner shall provide Contractor with a written statement of the reasons for such rejection within the time period required for Owner’s response, and Contractor shall provide Owner with agreed to revised and corrected Drawings and Specifications as soon as possible thereafter.

  • Construction Phase Services 3.1.1 – Basic Construction Services

  • Construction Phase Part 1 –

  • Development Phase contractual phase initiated with the approval of ANP for the Development Plan and which is extended during the Production Phase while investments in xxxxx, equipment, and facilities for the Production of Oil and Gas according to the Best Practices of the Oil Industry are required.

  • Review Period The Asset Representations Reviewer will complete the Review of all of the Review Receivables within sixty (60) days after having received access to the Review Materials pursuant to Section 3.2(a). However, if additional Review Materials are provided to the Asset Representations Reviewer in respect of any Review Receivables pursuant to Section 3.2(b), the Review period will be extended for an additional thirty (30) days in respect of any such Review Receivables.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!