Union Review Sample Clauses

Union Review. Union Representatives may examine a bargaining unit member's official personnel file, including the supervisor’s working file and the departmental personnel file, upon submission to the Employer of the bargaining unit member's written permission to do so. The Employer shall make available original or copies of the original records for examination by the Union Representative at the place where the records are kept.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Union Review. At the request of the Union, but not more frequently than once each four (4) years per classification, the Department of Administrative Services shall review up to five (5) designated classifications in the first year of the contract for duties, responsibilities, education and/or experience, certification and/or licensure and working condition factors. In the second year of the contract the Union may request up to four (4) reviews, and in the third year of the contract the Union may request up to three (3) reviews. Such review shall be combined with salary survey data to determine appropriate salary range assignment. Absent mutual agreement, said data shall not be used to reduce a classification pay range assignment. Such reviews shall be based upon a position description questionnaire survey of all incumbents in the classification, and shall be completed within one hundred eighty (180) days of the initial request. The timelines in classifications exceeding two hundred (200) incumbents will be mutually set. Each employee shall complete his/her own PDQ. Those employees who do not complete an individual PDQ shall be assigned to the appropriate classification and pay range based on the supervisor’s review. Employees on disability will be given the option to complete a PDQ, or have their supervisor complete a PDQ. Prior to the distribution of PDQs the Union and State shall conduct a joint training on how to complete PDQs. The content of the training shall be mutually agreed to by DAS and the Union. The scheduling and the training shall be mutually conducted by Agency personnel and the Union. The training shall be no more than two (2) hours. If an employee is found to have been improperly classified as determined from his/her PDQ, the employee shall be allocated to the appropriate classification in accordance with the finding of DAS. If the employee is performing duties of a lower classification, the employee shall be assigned into a lower classification and shall be placed in the step within the pay range that provides the employee with compensation that is equal to his/her current rate or that provides the least amount of increase, but no decrease in pay. Longevity supplements shall not decrease as a result of being placed in step X. If the employee’s base rate of pay exceeds the maximum rate of pay in the new pay range, the employee shall be placed in step X. If the employee is performing duties of a higher classification, the employee shall be placed in the...
Sample 1
Union Review. The Employer shall not conduct surveys at the facility without providing the Union an opportunity to review and comment on the questions and related issues. The Union shall be provided an advance copy of any survey(s), prior to their distribution to bargaining unit employees, and shall have a period of five (5) days to review the survey prior to its distribution.
Sample 1Sample 2
Union Review. (1) Where it is alleged that a violation of the merit staffing Article has occurred, designated Local 12 stewards shall notify the appropriate Management representative that preliminary examination of the record is being requested. Such a request need not specify the name of the individual or individuals directly involved, but must specify the announcement number and the type of records being requested. The designated xxxxxxx, in the presence of an appropriate Management representative, shall be given access to the complete record of the particular action. (2) At the initiative of Management or Local 12, specific merit staffing actions may be questioned or reviewed at an Agency Labor-Management Relations Committee (ALMRC) meeting. The Local 12 representatives shall be given access to the complete record of the actions. In addition, the representatives may secure through the head of the Agency a written explanation by the selecting official of his/her selections as required in Section 7.c.(3). While specific merit staffing actions may be reviewed at the Agency level, they will not be considered at the Departmental level, except as necessary to point up broader problems which either party is presenting. (3) Where it is alleged that a violation of this merit staffing Article has occurred, but there is disagreement as to the facts of the case, not resolved under (1) above, either party may request that the matter be investigated by a member of the staff of the Directorate of Personnel Management. It is understood that such review shall be carried out by a member of that staff who is familiar with merit staffing and whose name had previously been submitted to Local 12. Such request for review shall be attended to promptly. A report, either orally or in writing, shall be made available to each of the parties at the same time, and may contain recommendations as well as findings of fact.
Sample 1
Union Review. Upon approval of the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Librarian reasonable paid time off work of up to one (1) day shall be granted to up to three (3) members of the Union in order to review the Employer’s documentation. Within thirty (30) days the Union shall advise the Employer if it is in agreement with the rating(s) established by the Employer.
Sample 1
Union Review. The Union shall be offered the opportunity to review and provide comments on the District's Five Year Plan prior to its consideration by the Board of Directors.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Union Review. At the request of the uUnion, but not more frequently than once each four (4) years per classification, the Department of Administrative Services shall review up to five (5) designated classifications in the first year of the contract for duties, responsibilities, education and/or experience, certification and/or licensure and working condition factors. In the second year of the contract the Union may request up to four (4) reviews, and in the third year of the contract the Union may request up to three (3) reviews. Such review shall be combined with salary survey data to determine appropriate salary range assignment. Absent mutual agreement, said data shall not be used to reduce a classification pay range assignment. Such reviews shall be based upon a position description questionnaire survey of all incumbents in the classification, and shall be completed within one hundred eighty (180) twenty (120) days of the initial request. The timelines in classifications exceeding two three hundred (2300) incumbents will be mutually set. Each employee shall complete his/her own PDQ. Those employees who do not complete an individual PDQ shall be assigned to the appropriate classification and pay range based on the supervisor’s review. Employees on disability will be given the option to complete a PDQ, or have their supervisor complete a PDQ.
Sample 1

Related to Union Review

  • Exclusion Review Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Good Shepherd was in material breach of this CIA and, if so, whether: a. Good Shepherd cured such breach within 30 days of its receipt of the Notice of Material Breach; or b. the alleged material breach could not have been cured within the 30-day period, but that, during the 30-day period following Good Shepherd’s receipt of the Notice of Material Breach: (i) Good Shepherd had begun to take action to cure the material breach; (ii) Good Shepherd pursued such action with due diligence; and (iii) Good Shepherd provided to OIG a reasonable timetable for curing the material breach. For purposes of the exclusion herein, exclusion shall take effect only after an ALJ decision favorable to OIG, or, if the ALJ rules for Good Shepherd, only after a DAB decision in favor of OIG. Good Shepherd’s election of its contractual right to appeal to the DAB shall not abrogate OIG’s authority to exclude Good Shepherd upon the issuance of an ALJ’s decision in favor of OIG. If the ALJ sustains the determination of OIG and determines that exclusion is authorized, such exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues such a decision, notwithstanding that Good Shepherd may request review of the ALJ decision by the DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Good Shepherd shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Good Shepherd, Good Shepherd shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Classification Review (A) Reclassification Request (a) An employee who has good reason to believe that they are improperly classified may apply, in writing by electronic mail, to their immediate out-of-scope Manager to have their classification reviewed. This may occur when there has been a substantive change in the job functions, when there has been a change in organizational structure that significantly impacts roles, or when a classification specification has been amended in a manner that alters the basis on which classification levels are differentiated. The employee making the request will indicate the reason(s) why they believe their position is inappropriately classified, including the changes that have occurred to the position, organization or classification specifications. In some circumstances, a classification review may be initiated in response to a long standing perceived inequity in how a position is classified. However, where a review has been previously conducted, employees should not request a subsequent classification review unless there has been a substantive change as described above. Submissions must include an approved job description, in the event that a current job description is not available an employee can initiate their written request so as to establish a potential effective date as per article 40.04(a). The manager shall send a copy of the employee’s request to Human Resources without delay, and shall confirm in writing to the employee and the Union that the employee’s request has been received. The manager shall advise the employee of the results of the classification review within ninety (90) calendar days of receiving the request. The notification shall be in writing and include rationale for the decision, specifically addressing the reasons for the review provided by the employee. (b) When reviewing a request for reclassification, the Employer shall follow the guidelines included in the Classification Specification User Manual. Requests are reviewed by the Employer. The evaluation of the role may include an audit of the role, including interviews with the Employee and the Employee’s Manager as needed. (c) Should the employee feel that they have not received proper consideration in regard to a classification review, they may request that the matter be referred to the Internal Appeal Process.

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!