Stipulated Facts Sample Clauses

Stipulated Facts. For purposes of this Agreement only, the following constitutes a summary of facts by the EPA and SCDHEC upon which this Agreement is based. A. The DOE owns and operates the SRS. The SRS produces plutonium, tritium, and other special nuclear materials for national defense, for other governmental uses, and for civilian uses. The SRS is the nation's primary source of reactor-produced nuclear defense materials. Construction of the SRS began in 1951. The SRS is located near Aiken, South Carolina, and is approximately twenty-five (25) miles southeast of Augusta, Georgia. The SRS encompasses approximately three hundred (300) square miles. B. In March 1979, the SRS discontinued operation of seven (7) chemical, metal, and pesticide disposal pits. In 1984, under the approval and supervision of the State of South Carolina, the SRS excavated these pits and removed contaminated material. Additional groundwater monitoring xxxxx were installed. C. On December 19, 1979, pursuant to the State of South Carolina's regulations, the SRS notified the SCDHEC of SRS's hazardous waste management activities. The SRS submitted a copy of its notification to the EPA. D. In August 1980, pursuant to Section 3010 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6910, the SRS notified EPA of SRS's hazardous waste management activities and submitted a copy of the notification to the SCDHEC. E. On September 29, 1980, the SRS submitted "Part A" of its hazardous waste management permit application to the SCDHEC and EPA. Since that time, the SRS has modified its "Part A" to include new units or modifications to existing units. The SRS submitted "Part B" of its permit application on February 11, 1985. F. In February 1984, the SRS began groundwater corrective/remedial action by the use of an air stripper at the SRS M-Area. G. On May 8, 1984, the SRS prepared an assessment of its waste disposal sites and groundwater impacts (Technical Summary Groundwater Quality Protection Program at Savannah River Plant). H. On May 31, 1984, the DOE notified the EPA of potential CERCLA sites at DOE facilities, including the SRS. I. On January 7, 1987, the SRS submitted to EPA a document entitled, "Waste Management Units - Savannah River Plant," which contained a listing of solid waste management units (SWMUs) on the SRS. The SWMUs list is revised annually and provided to EPA and SCDHEC. J. On September 30, 1987, the SCDHEC and EPA issued a RCRA permit for the SRS. The Federal RCRA permit requires the SRS to initiate RFIs for listed SWMUs u...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Stipulated Facts. Respondent's address on file with the Bureau is: 000 X. 0xx Xx., Xxx 0, Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000.
Stipulated Facts. The following events are relevant to this matter: a. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, at the time relevant to this RFO, was a CCSD Trustee, and a public officer as defined in NRS 281A.160. b. CCSD is a political subdivision as defined in NRS 281A.145. c. Xxxxxx XxXxxx, Esq. is a licensed Nevada attorney, employed as General Counsel for the Clark County School District. d. Xxxxx Xxxxxxx is employed as a CCSD Administrative Secretary II for the Board, serves as secretary to Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx and other trustees, and is a public employee under NRS 281A.150. e. At a special meeting of the Board, the Board discussed the substance of a potential ballot question, and voted unanimously on Friday, June 8, 2012 to place a capital projects tax question on the Clark County ballot in the November 6, 2012 election. f. Nevada Revised Statutes state that a local school board of trustees “may build, purchase or rent schoolhouses and other school buildings,” (NRS 393.080(1) (a)) and that it “shall keep the public school buildings . . . in such repair as is necessary for the comfort and health of pupils and teachers.” (NRS 393.100) The Board voted to approve the formation of a ballot question which sought voter support for additional taxes or the issuance of bonds to construct and maintain adequate school facilities. g. Later known as “Ballot Question 2” the question proposed to permit the CCSD to levy an additional property tax rate not to exceed 21.2 cents (per $100 of assessed valuation) to finance capital projects for schools, including constructing and equipping school improvements and replacements and acquiring school sites. h. Various members of the Board reached out to community supporters to increase awareness and support for Ballot Question 2, and partnered with the School Improvement Committee, a political action committee (hereafter referred to as the “PAC”), to promote its passage. i. Throughout the campaign, the PAC, Trustees and CCSD made careful efforts to separate activities to ensure that any persuasive materials, activities, and communications related to Ballot Question 2 were paid for by the PAC rather than the school district. j. CCSD offered parents and employees objective information related to the needs of the schools and the impact that the successful passage of Ballot Question 2 would have on CCSD. k. On October 16, 2012, four days prior to the beginning of early voting in Clark County Nevada, Xxxxxxxx caused an email to be sent to her email list of CCSD constituen...
Stipulated Facts. At all material times, the following stipulated facts were relevant to this matter:
Stipulated Facts. At all material times, the following events were relevant to this matter:
Stipulated Facts. At all material times relevant to the allegations in this matter, the Commission and Xxxxxxxxxxx agree to the following facts:1 x. Xxxxxxxxxxx was the LVCVA President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). b. The CEO is appointed by and responsible for carrying out all policy directives of the LVCVA Board, including marketing, operation of facilities, human resources, finance and public affairs. c. The LVCVA is a statutorily created public entity responsible as the destination marketing organization for Las Vegas to promote tourism, conventions, meetings and special events throughout Southern Nevada. It operates one of 1 Stipulated Facts do not constitute part of the “Investigative File” as that term is defined by NRS 281A.755. All statutory and common law protections afforded to the Investigative File shall remain and are not affected by this Stipulated Agreement. the largest convention facilities in the world and competes for visitors with the largest visitor destinations in the world. d. The LVCVA is a governmental entity subject to Nevada’s Open Meeting Law (NRS Chapter 241), Public Records Law (NRS Chapter 239) and Ethics Law. e. The LVCVA obtains its funding, in part, from a percentage of hotel taxes and fees in Southern Nevada. Its primary goal is to increase tourism in the region for economic development purposes. f. The LVCVA is governed by a 14-member Board comprised of 8 elected officials representing the municipalities and counties in Southern Nevada and 6 representatives from the private sector. g. The LVCVA maintained Board Policies, which included Policy 8.01 - Code of Conduct and Conflicts of Interest Policy (the “Policy”). The Policy in effect during the relevant time period required compliance with the Ethics Law and states that LVCVA’s directors, officers and employees shall work for the common good of the public that LVCVA serves and not for any private or personal interest. The Policy also prohibited LVCVA’s directors, officers and employees from using their office or position for unlawful purposes or personal gain, including seeking or accepting gifts, services, favors, employments, engagements, emoluments or economic opportunities that would improperly influence their public duties; using their position in government to secure unwarranted privileges for themselves or persons to whom they have commitments in a private capacity; or using governmental property to benefit their personal or financial interests. h. Part of the LVCVA’s missio...
Stipulated Facts. For purposes of this Agreement only, the stipulated facts presented in Appendix D (Stipulated Facts) to this Agreement constitute a summary of facts upon which this Agreement is based.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Stipulated Facts. On September 9, 2011, Cintex Wireless, LLC (“Cintex”) filed an application with the Missouri Public Service Commission seeking designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (“ETC”) for the purpose of receiving federal universal service fund support for low income customers through the Lifeline program as a wireless carrier in the State of Missouri. On December 16, 2011, the Staff recommended that Cintex be granted ETC status.
Stipulated Facts. The Settling Parties have stipulated to the facts set forth below for purposes of this Settlement Agreement. 1. In 2020, PG&E initiated a total of seven PSPS events and submitted seven post event reports to the Commission. 2. As authorized by the Commission, SED investigated PG&E’s compliance with Resolution ESRB-8, Decision (D.) 00-00-000 and D.00-00-000 in executing its 2020 PSPS events. 3. On June 15, 2022, the SED issued a proposed Administrative Enforcement Order (AEO) to PG&E pursuant to the Commission Enforcement Policy adopted by Resolution M-4846. 4. In the AEO, SED alleges that PG&E did not comply with provisions of Commission Resolution ESRB-8, D.00-00-000, and D.00-00-000, as identified in the AEO and detailed in attachment to the Administrative Enforcement Order “2020 Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) Post Event Report Review” (2020 Post Event Report). 5. In the AEO, SED directs PG&E to take six corrective actions to address findings in the AEO. XXX also recommends that PG&E pay a monetary penalty of $12 million due to PG&E’s failure to notify some customers during de-energization and re-energization. 6. PG&E submitted a Request for Hearing of the proposed AEO on the grounds that the $12 million penalty was excessive. PG&E has implemented or will implement the corrective actions, including modifying procedures to provide notice to customers upon de-energization.
Stipulated Facts. At all material times, the following stipulated facts were relevant to these matters:1 x. Xxxxxx has served as a City Councilmember for the City of Mesquite since 2011. He is a public officer as defined in NRS 281A.160. b. The City of Mesquite is a political subdivision as defined in NRS 281A.145. c. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Esq. is a lawyer licensed in Nevada and is the City Attorney for Mesquite. x. Xxxxxx is a licensed real estate agent in Nevada. e. On October 20, 2011, Xxxxxx entered into an Independent Contractor Agreement with Premier Properties of Mesquite Nevada, LLC (“Premier Properties”). f. Pursuant to his Agreement with Premier Properties, Xxxxxx receives no salary but is entitled to 80% of the commission collected by Premier Properties from real estate sales transactions closed by Xxxxxx. Xxxxxx does not receive any commission or other compensation for transactions made by the other real estate agents of Premier Properties. g. Pursuant to an agreement between Premier Properties and Legacy Homes, Xxxxxx works full-time as a sales representative selling new homes at three Legacy Homes (“Legacy”) developments in Mesquite. He is the sole real estate sales agent for Legacy in Mesquite. x. Xxxxxx is permitted to list homes as a Premier Properties agent, and he has done so approximately 5 times since 2011 for Legacy homeowners who were listing their homes for resale. x. Xxxxxx works out of a sales office located in a Legacy model home, utilizing office supplies provided by Legacy and an assistant who is employed by Legacy. x. Xxxxxx’x listings of new Legacy properties appear on the Premier Properties website, where he is identified as one of twenty agents of Premier Properties. 1 Stipulated Facts do not constitute part of the “Investigative File” as that term is defined by NRS 281A.440(17). All statutory and common law protections afforded to the Investigative File shall remain and are not affected by this Stipulated Agreement. k. At the City Council’s April 14, 2015 meeting, the Council approved a resolution finding that it was in the best interests of the City to sell certain city-owned real property consisting of approximately 104 acres in the Mesquite Technology and Commerce Center (hereafter “MTCC Property”). l. Three entities approached the City to express interest in purchasing the MTCC Property: 1) 333 Eagles Landing, LLC (“Eagles Landing”); 2) Mesquite Exit 118 Group, LLC; and 3) Mr. Xxx Xx Xxx.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!