Project Prioritization. The FAA does not normally issue a design approval for a product manufactured outside the United States unless it is to be imported, i.e., an aircraft to be U.S.-registered or an engine, propeller, appliance or part to be incorporated into the design of a U.S.-registered aircraft or U.S.-manufactured product. Union applicants for U.S. design approval should provide the FAA with evidence of import. EASA will adopt a similar project prioritization approach for applications from U.S. applicants under this agreement.
Project Prioritization. The District will notice the public 30 days prior to the acceptance of project applications. Applications submitted for conversion projects that are eligible for the Program will be approved on a first-come, first served basis.
Project Prioritization. Recommended improvement projects will be identified. Roadways will be analyzed by a number of different transportation factors.
1. Traffic growth from the OP Model
2. Land development potential and constraints based on interviews with the City and surrounding communities
3. Traffic analysis results
4. Pavement conditions (City will Provide) (Note: Costs and safety will not be considered in this evaluation)
Project Prioritization. The selection and timing of particular projects for Program Access Improvements (including, without limitation, the selection of the types of Program Access Improvements set forth in Section 12.4 above that will be conducted, the selection of locations where installation, remediation or other construction will be conducted, the selection of personnel, materials, methodologies and technologies to be utilized, and the order and scope of the particular projects) shall be determined by the City in its discretion, subject to the following priorities:
(a) Program Access Improvements needed to address Pedestrian Facilities serving the following (in descending order of prioritization):
(i) City government offices and facilities (including the pedestrian rights of way adjacent to facilities owned or operated by the City, and the paths of travel leading from such adjacent pedestrian rights of way to the primary entrances to such facilities). Program Access Improvements with respect to Pedestrian Facilities serving City government offices and facilities shall be prioritized with the goal of completing such work within the first five years of the Compliance Period (if feasible);
(ii) transportation corridors;
(iii) hospitals, medical facilities, assisted living facilities, and other similar facilities; business zones; undeveloped areas.
(iv) places of public accommodation such as commercial and
(v) facilities containing employers; and
(vi) other areas such as residential neighborhoods and
(b) With respect to Program Access Improvements addressing the Pedestrian Facilities set forth in this Section 12.7, the following barrier removal work shall receive priority:
(i) Installation of missing curb ramps;
(ii) Repair of damage caused by tree roots to sidewalk or walkway surfaces so that the sidewalk or walkway surfaces are made accessible to and usable by persons with Mobility Disabilities;
(iii) Upgrading of existing curb ramps to comply with the standards set forth in Section 12.9 below;
(iv) Repair of broken and/or uneven pavement in the pedestrian rights of way (including utility covers or repair covers) deeper and/or wider than 1/2 inch;
(v) Repair of vertical or horizontal displacement or upheaval of the sidewalk or crosswalk surface greater than 1/2 inch (including sidewalk flags, curbs and utility covers); sections of sidewalks;
(vi) Correction of non-compliant cross-slopes in sidewalks or
(vii) Removal of protruding and overhanging objects and/or obstructions that...
Project Prioritization. The licensee will consult with the USDA-FS and Skagit County to develop criteria to prioritize sites for treatment. Factors that will be considered when prioritizing sites will include (but not be limited to): • Location relative to recreation sites, heritage resources, aesthetic, cultural sites and facilities; • Severity and ongoing rate of erosion; • Land ownership; • Likelihood of treatment success; • Approximate cost of treatment; and • Available funding. The criteria will be used to rank the list of potential treatment sites and identify those sites that are considered highest priority for treatment.
Project Prioritization. (a) The Signatory States agree to prioritizing projects based upon those projects which provide the most benefit to solving the problems of reducing congestion, enhancing mobility, improving safety, reducing environmental impacts, minimizing impacts to communities and public health, improving security, enhancing economic development, and facilitating multimodal integration. Projects shall be evaluated and selected upon their merit to achieve the objectives of the CFP and factors specified in the Development Agreement. An example of project evaluation factors is contained in Exhibit C, Project Selection Criteria. Phase 2 of the feasibility study will include recommendations for project selection criteria with objective data and information to support the decision making process.
(b) The Signatory States will maintain a prioritization Schedule per the Development Agreement. The Prioritization Schedule shall be submitted to the USDOT within 120 days of the decision to proceed with a dedicated truck lane corridor and shall be attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B, as amended from time to time.
Project Prioritization. Each of the four processes described in Section 2.2 result in the creation of sewer rehabilitation and replacement projects. The emergency projects are addressed immediately through existing emergency services contracts. The expedited projects are dispatched and addressed in a matter of months and are completed in the order the projects are dispatched. The primary and secondary sewer projects are placed into the wastewater capital improvements program and are scheduled for design and construction in the same order as planned since primary sewers and secondary sewer basins are planned in priority order. The City has a process to review project priorities on an annual basis as part of the Wastewater Capital Improvements Program (WCIP) annual reviews and to accelerated or decelerated project schedules if deemed necessary. Additionally, the City has a Program Review Committee (PRC) that meets monthly to review and modify project scope and schedule if deemed necessary.
Project Prioritization. “Priorities”). The selection of projects for Program Access Improvements will be based on needed Program Access Improvements that have been identified by the Department through Access Requests and other means. These projects will be prioritized as follows:
A. The highest priority will go to Program Access Improvements needed to address the most severe access barriers and most significant safety hazards for class members.
B. The next level of priority will go to Program Access Improvements needed to address Pedestrian Facilities and / or Park and Ride Facilities serving:
1) State and local government offices and facilities;
2) important transportation corridors;
3) places of public accommodation such as commercial and business zones;
4) facilities containing employers; and
5) other areas such as residential neighborhoods and undeveloped areas of the State.
Project Prioritization. This subtask will:
1. Evaluate and revise as necessary the Plan’s existing review, selection, and prioritization procedure in order to include Review Factors A through L from the “Project Review Process” section of the Proposition 84 IRWM Guidelines p. 48-51;
2. Review each of the Plan’s projects using the process described in Chapter 6 (which will include the results from Tasks 4 and 5) as amended to include changes in Chapters 2 through 5.
3. Revise the Plan’s project prioritization guidelines so that stakeholders/project proponents can determine what stage of development a project is at, whether a project should be considered for inclusion in the Plan, and what steps project proponents might take to insure that a project will be included in the Plan or project proposal.
a. Potential screening criteria could include how well projects help meet the objectives and priorities in the Plan, how they are scored in a project package, how they address DAC and Environmental Justice (EJ) concerns, how they address strategic needs or Statewide priorities within the region.
4. Result in a new suite of prioritized projects for inclusion in the Plan, with input from and review by stakeholders. This work is related to the work for Project 4.
Project Prioritization. Task 6.1 CIP Project List Development The Consultant will review current TMP project lists to determine if any projects are completed, under development, or no longer feasible and update the status of projects. The Consultant will consolidate the existing project lists for roadways, intersections, pedestrians, bikes, transit, and system management into one Transportation Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), removing overlaps between projects, and updating planning level cost estimates based on revisions to cross sections, project scopes, and updated construction cost information publicly available. Task 6.2 CIP Project Prioritization Using goals and objectives identified in Task 2.3, the Consultant will work with City staff to develop priorities for transportation project evaluation and prioritization for roadway projects. The Consultant will develop a prioritization tool to rank projects based on up to six (6) mobility priorities and weighting each priority with measures of effectiveness. The results of the exercises in this subtask will be used to develop a prioritization tool for ranking projects in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Standalone sidewalk, bike, trail, intersection and other projects will be shown and dollars allocated on an annual basis in the CIP, but not prioritized as part of this effort. The resulting prioritized project list will include a subset of projects anticipated to be completed in a 10-year planning window in support of Task 3.
