–ANCILLARY STAFF EVALUATION Sample Clauses

–ANCILLARY STAFF EVALUATION. A. Ancillary staff will be evaluated every year. Ancillary staff may elect to have an association representative present during post-observation conferences between the ancillary staff and an administrator.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
–ANCILLARY STAFF EVALUATION. Section A. Evaluation of Ancillary Staff‌ The evaluation of the work and performance of all ancillary staff is the right and responsibility of the Administration. The District and the Association agree that evaluation is necessary for the continuous improvement of instruction, for reinforcement of good performance and for the identification of those areas for which ancillary staff may need assistance. The evaluation process shall provide for the use of recommendations for improvement and assistance to the ancillary staff. Details of the evaluation process, evaluation forms and the ancillary staff’s general responsibilities are to be negotiated between the District and KEA. Every ancillary staff shall be provided a copy of this document at the beginning of the school year, or at the time of hire for a new ancillary staff and shall be provided training in the evaluation process. The “Framework” and all forms of the evaluation process shall also be available online, including specific rubrics for Guidance Counselors, School Social Workers, Physical Therapists, Occupational Therapists, Speech Pathologists and School Nurses. Forms may be completed electronically, but printed copies must be filed with Human Resources, where required.
Sample 1Sample 2
–ANCILLARY STAFF EVALUATION. The Xxxxxxxx Park ANCILLARY STAFF Evaluation is detailed in the documents called “Evaluation and Professional Development Program”, “Non-disciplinary Support Program”, “Disciplinary Program” of Xxxxxxxx Park Public Schools. This is the agreed upon evaluation system for the ancillary staff members of this bargaining unit and is a part of the master agreement.
Sample 1
–ANCILLARY STAFF EVALUATION. The Employer acting by and through its administrators shall be responsible for the evaluation of each ancillary staff in the performance of his/her professional duties. The evaluation of ancillary staff shall conform to the following guidelines.
Sample 1
–ANCILLARY STAFF EVALUATION. A. The evaluation of the work and performance of all ancillary staff is the right and responsibility of the Administration. The District and the Association agree that evaluation is necessary for the continuous improvement of instruction, for reinforcement of good performance and for the identification of those areas for which ancillary staff may need assistance. The evaluation process shall provide for the use of recommendations for improvement and assistance to the ancillary staff. Details of the evaluation process, evaluation forms and the ancillary staff’s general responsibilities are to be negotiated between the District and KEA. Every ancillary staff shall be provided a copy of this document at the beginning of the school year, or at the time of hire for a new ancillary staff, and shall be provided training in the evaluation process. The “Framework” and all forms of the evaluation process shall also be available online. Forms may be completed electronically, but printed copies must be filed with Human Resources, where required.
Sample 1
–ANCILLARY STAFF EVALUATION. A. Teacher Observation and Evaluation
Sample 1
–ANCILLARY STAFF EVALUATION. A. Any formal monitoring or observation of the work of an ancillary staff person shall be conducted openly. B. Each professional staff person shall have the right, upon request, to review the contents of his/her own personnel file. A representative of the Association may, at the professional staff person’s request, accompany the professional staff person in such review. The professional staff person shall affix his/her signature and the date to the record to signify he/she has reviewed his/her file and is aware of the contents. Review of the personnel file shall be as provided by law. C. An ancillary staff person will be given the opportunity to review and discuss his/her formal evaluation with the reviewing administrator within ten (10) work days of the evaluation. No formal evaluation shall be conducted two (2) working days prior to Thanksgiving, Christmas, or Easter. D. An ancillary staff person who disagrees with an evaluation may submit a written answer which shall be attached to the file copy of the formal evaluation in question. E. Probationary professional staff shall be assigned a mentor by the administration as per the district mentorship program. A mentor is a voluntary position. a. Mentors shall be paid four hundred ($400) dollars per school year, paid in two (2) installments, one (1) in January and one (1) in June. a. The Union Group Sharing Committee will meet at least once a year and may review and revise the mentorship plan.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
–ANCILLARY STAFF EVALUATION. ‌ A. The parties recognize that the purpose of ancillary staff Employee evaluations is to maintain a high quality of student support and instruction in the Wayland Union Schools and to assist teachers in improving their classroom effectiveness. Whenever a time period of less than ten (10) days is described in this Article, it shall exclude workdays in which the Employee or evaluator are absent. B. The parties agree that the Employee evaluation procedure shall provide for informal opportunities for the evaluator to record the performance of the employee at other times in addition to the formal work setting visitations. C. All probationary ancillary staff Employees will be formally observed at least two (2) times each probationary year, as part of the formal evaluation process. 1. The first probationary ancillary staff Employee observation shall be completed within two (2) months of commencement of employment. 2. At least two (2) of the observations of the probationary ancillary staff Employee will be at least sixty (60) calendar days apart unless the ancillary staff and evaluator otherwise agree. 3. Non-probationary ancillary staff Employees will be formally evaluated annually or at least one (1) time every three (3) years if they receive a Highly Effective evaluation for two consecutive years with each evaluation based on at least two (2) formal observations. 4. Ancillary staff Employees who are not eligible to acquire tenure status will serve a two or four- or five-year probationary period as if they were eligible to acquire tenure, as applicable. D. Ancillary staff evaluations shall be conducted by the employee's building principal(s) or immediate supervisor. As part of the individualized development plan, the evaluating administrator may request a second administrator or consultant to observe and/or review the employee’s work. This input shall not by itself cause an employee to be found unsatisfactory or be the sole basis for discipline. Before an evaluation of any employee, the evaluator shall consult with the Employee regarding the evaluation. This may be done in a general meeting of all those being evaluated or in an individual meeting. This meeting shall include an explanation of all formal documents being used by the evaluator. 1. Prior to the evaluation process and at other times during the year, the building principal, or at the request of the building principal, another administrator or consultant is encouraged to visit the work setting informal...
Sample 1
–ANCILLARY STAFF EVALUATION. Section A. Evaluation of Ancillary Staff‌ The evaluation of the work and performance of all ancillary staff is the right and responsibility of the Administration. The District and the Association agree that evaluation is necessary for the continuous improvement of instruction, for reinforcement of good performance and for the identification of those areas for which ancillary staff may need assistance. The evaluation process shall provide for the use of recommendations for improvement and assistance to the ancillary staff. Details of the evaluation process, evaluation forms and the ancillary staff’s general responsibilities are to be negotiated between the District and KEA. Every ancillary staff shall be provided a copy of this document at the beginning of the school year, or at the time of hire for a new ancillary staff, and shall be provided training in the evaluation process. The “Framework” and all forms of the evaluation process shall also be available online. Forms may be completed electronically, but printed copies must be filed with Human Resources, where required.
Sample 1

Related to –ANCILLARY STAFF EVALUATION

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the Fall semester.

  • Student Evaluation a. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall be responsible for administering the student evaluation process. b. Student evaluation packets for each class containing instruments and instructions shall be distributed to each faculty member by the first week of December during the fall semester and by the last week in April during the spring semester. c. It is expressly agreed that the faculty member being evaluated shall not be present in the classroom when the student evaluation is being administered and that all instruction to students with regard to such student evaluation shall be included in writing on the instrument, provided further that the designated unit or non-unit professional shall return the student evaluation directly to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The administering of the student evaluation shall be the responsibility of the President of the College or the President’s designee who shall determine who among unit or non-unit professionals shall administer such student evaluation. Student evaluations shall be valid only if signed by the student; provided, however, that faculty members shall not be entitled to the identity of the student responding unless such student evaluation is used as a basis for dismissal or other disciplinary action and such will be communicated to the students. d. The data from the student evaluation shall be tabulated and copies sent to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The raw data shall be retained by the College for a period of one (1) year during which time the faculty member shall have access thereto upon written request. e. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall review the tabulated data and shall forward a data summary to the faculty member by January 23 for the fall semester and by June 15 for the spring semester. f. The faculty member shall have seven (7) working days in which to respond to such data.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS 6.1 Administrators will meet with new employees to discuss their job description within one (1) month of hire. The Administrator and new employee will sign off on the job description and it will be forwarded to the Human Resources Department for inclusion in the employee‘s personnel file. The Human Resources Department will compile and distribute a list showing each employee‘s evaluator prior to November 1st of each year. Bargaining unit job descriptions will be made available via the District‘s web site. 6.2 Evaluations will transpire as follows for employees that are receiving satisfactory ratings: a. New hires—regular part-time (school year employees) will be evaluated at three (3) and six (6) working months. b. New hires—full time (12 month employees) will be evaluated at three (3), six (6) and twelve (12) months. c. After the initial year of employment, each employee shall be evaluated at least once annually by March 31st. 6.3 Criteria for evaluating bargaining unit members will be based on the performance categories outlined on the evaluation form as related to the job description of their specific position assignment. 6.4 Evaluation reports shall include feedback regarding strengths and weaknesses (if any) demonstrated by the employee. Prior to an employee receiving a rating less than “Meets Expectations,” the employee shall be advised of the performance concern and provided with a clear statement of any deficiency and a statement defining acceptable performance. This shall occur within a reasonable time prior to the final evaluation to allow the employee a chance to demonstrate improvement. 6.5 In the event an employee is evaluated overall as “Does Not Meet Expectations,” the district, in consultation with the employee and the Association, will provide the employee a written plan of improvement (See Employee Plan of Improvement form in Appendix). The plan shall clearly define all areas of deficiency, provide clear and attainable performance goals, and outline supports (if any) to be given, including any necessary training at the District’s expense. The employee will be given a reasonable amount of time, not to exceed sixty (60) working days, to meet job performance expectations. During the improvement period, feedback will be provided through a minimum of three scheduled meetings. Following the completion of the plan, the supervisor shall notify the employee in writing of the outcome. Failure to demonstrate satisfactory improvement may constitute grounds for termination. 6.6 The bargaining unit member shall be given a copy of their evaluation, and any data collection sheets (with the submitters name excluded) used in the evaluation. 6.7 Under the law there is no right to Association Representation at evaluation conferences. 6.8 Any information shared with the evaluating administrator for the evaluation process shall be recorded on Data Collection Sheet(s), with the exception of those unit members that have supervising teachers. Supervising teachers will work directly with the evaluating administrator to share performance information for inclusion in the unit member‘s evaluation. 6.9 Employees shall have the right to respond to evaluations in writing. Such written response shall be attached to the evaluation if received within 5 days. 6.10 No bargaining unit member shall be required to sign a blank or incomplete evaluation form.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!