Core Systems Assessment Clause Samples

Core Systems Assessment. For facility which do not require a detailed approach, but where accuracy of information is critical, this fully-remote approach leverages the power and insights that exist in ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s cost and facilities databases (RS Means, Sightlines, and Gordian JOC) to assess building needs at a system-level (Uniformat Level 3). This approach uses database cost- models, existing maintenance data, and user experiences to focus on the 20 most critical systems in each building which comprise over 95% of the identifiable needs within a facility. The system-level cost models are then customized for each unique facility to accurately reflect the specific needs of that physical asset. The selected baseline approach is used to assemble the inventory - through building assessments, data migrations, and cost-model creation. The resulting inventory is stored in the secure Gordian Cloud platform where accessibility and continued accuracy of the data can be ensured. This web-based platform will be the central repository for all detailed assessments, migrated data, cost models, and strategic tools as they are created. An introduction to this platform will begin during the baselining stage but will continue throughout the partnership with ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, as sustained engagement on the platform will be critical to the longevity and sustainment of the project results. Formal training on the usage of Gordian Cloud will be delivered after the conclusion of the project. What makes Gordian unique is the integration with operational perspectives and customized strategy tools. To harness the vast amount of latent knowledge held by supervision and trades staff, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will conduct interviews with facilities managers and other knowledgeable individuals. We find these interviews invaluable to: Confirm and adjust assumptions in the Core Systems and Detailed Assessments Confirm building and system alignment with operational objectives and direction. Validate life cycle and pricing estimates. Build operator confidence in the process, project recommendations and overall findings. * Supervisor interviews are an iterative process requiring equal involvement of the community, institution, or district and Gordian staff. The time commitment required of community, institution, or district staff can vary, ranging from a few hours to a couple days. Because this stage runs through Gordian Cloud, these interviews can happen on- site or remotely through a web-meeting, as requested. An assessment that stops at thi...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Core Systems Assessment. For facility which do not require a detailed approach, but where accuracy of information is critical, this fully-remote approach leverages the power and insights that exist in Gordian’s cost and facilities databases (RS Means, Gordian Planning, and Gordian JOC) to assess building needs at a system-level (Uniformat Level 3). This approach uses database cost- models, existing maintenance data, and user experiences to focus on the 20 most critical systems in each building which comprise over 95% of the identifiable needs within a facility. The system- level cost models are then customized for each unique facility to accurately reflect the specific needs of that physical asset. Once the selection of the baseline approach is complete, the next step is to assemble the inventory through building assessments, data migrations, and cost-model creation. The resulting inventory is stored in Gordian Cloud’s secure platform, which leads us to phase 2.
View Source
Core Systems Assessment. A fully-remote approach leverages the power and insights that exist in Gordian’s cost and facilities databases (RSMeans, Gordian Planning, and Gordian JOC) to assess building needs at a system-level (Uniformat Level 3). Because all three baseline approaches result in Uniformat codifications and are compared using RSMeans pricing, we are able to create a consistent and apples-to-apples inventory of facilities needs across your portfolio of physical assets.
View Source

Related to Core Systems Assessment

  • Information Systems Acquisition Development and Maintenance a. Client Data – Client Data will only be used by State Street for the purposes specified in this Agreement.

  • Impact Assessments 5.1 The Parties shall: (a) provide all reasonable assistance to the each other to prepare any data protection impact assessment as may be required (including provision of detailed information and assessments in relation to Processing operations, risks and measures); and (b) maintain full and complete records of all Processing carried out in respect of the Personal Data in connection with the contract, in accordance with the terms of Article 30 GDPR.

  • Needs Assessment 1. The Contractor shall conduct a cultural and linguistic group-needs assessment of the eligible client population in the Contractor’s service area to assess the language needs of the population and determine what reasonable steps are necessary to ensure meaningful access to services and activities to eligible individuals. [22 CCR 98310, 98314] The group-needs assessment shall take into account the following four (4) factors: a. Number or proportion of persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) eligible to be served or encountered by the program. b. Frequency with which LEP individuals come in contact with the program. c. Nature and importance of the services provided. d. Local or frequently used resources available to the Contractor. This group-needs assessment will serve as the basis for the Contractor’s determination of “reasonable steps” and provide documentary evidence of compliance with Cal. Gov. Code § 11135 et seq.; 2 CCR 11140, 2 CCR 11200 et seq., and 22 CCR98300 et seq. 2. The Contractor shall prepare and make available a report of the findings of the group-needs assessment that summarizes: a. Methodologies used. b. The linguistic and cultural needs of non-English speaking or LEP groups. c. Services proposed to address the needs identified and a timeline for implementation. [22 CCR 98310] 3. The Contractor shall maintain a record of the group-needs assessment on file at the Contractor’s headquarters at all times during the term of this Agreement. [22 CCR 98310, 98313]

  • Construction Phase Services 3.1.1 – Basic Construction Services

  • Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Development of a transportation project must comply with applicable environmental laws. The party named in article 1, Responsible Parties, under AGREEMENT is responsible for the following: A. The identification and assessment of any environmental problems associated with the development of a local project governed by this Agreement. B. The cost of any environmental problem’s mitigation and remediation. C. Providing any public meetings or public hearings required for the environmental assessment process. Public hearings will not be held prior to the approval of Project schematic. D. The preparation of the NEPA documents required for the environmental clearance of this Project. If the Local Government is responsible for the environmental assessment and mitigation, before the advertisement for bids, the Local Government shall provide to the State written documentation from the appropriate regulatory agency or agencies that all environmental clearances have been obtained.