Test Planning. For all supplied products, the supplier must create a test planning for incoming goods inspection, parts tests and component tests as well as the final test, and implement it during the process. All tests must be documented in the production control plan. The scope of the tests is defined by the drawing and / or SQP agreements. Particularly in the event of quality problems, the supplier must adjust his test planning accordingly. The standard IATF 16949 shall be used as a basis for that. In the event of incapable processes, a 100% test of the characteristics shall be conducted according to CPK-requirements.
Test Planning. The Contractor shall ensure all test documentation and activities are traceable to requirements, issues or incidents, including test plans, test cases, test data staging, test scenarios, and test scripts in accordance with established PDSS processes. The Contractor shall properly set up the test environment and required data to support testing. All test documentation is subject to Government approval prior to use in support of system changes, no matter the Contractor’s perceived magnitude of the change. The Contractor shall perform RCA (CDRL A001) and may be required to provide a short and long term testing plan. The Contractor shall plan and execute required test and evaluation processes to include data quality and performance tests as required. The Contractor shall provide test strategy, planning and execution schedule with external partners. The Contractor shall follow a repeatable test strategy for system changes. The Contractor shall identify and communicate test risks, resource requirements, supporting service needs, and scheduling milestones. When required, the Contractor shall prepare and deliver for Government approval, test documentation, including detailed Test Plans (CDRL C001), test cases (CDRL C002), and test scripts (CDRL C003) that are traceable to requirements, issues or incidents. As a part of CDRL C001, the Contractor shall identify required Government support such as Government furnished property, equipment, information, external partners, or data required to conduct testing activities necessary to carry out any tasks in this section. The Contractor shall provide proposed test scripts and technical justification for level of testing, to include: function unit test, regression, and failover. The Contractor is encouraged to utilize prescanned scripts to resolve known issues. The Contractor shall provide a roll- back plan for each system change. All test documentation shall be uploaded by the Contractor into the Government’s data repository. CDRL A001 – Scientific and Technical Report - (RCA Report) CDRL C001 - Test Plan CDRL C002 - Software Test Description (STD) - (Test Case) CDRL C003 - Software Test Description (STD) - (Test Script)
Test Planning. Test planning shall stipulate: - which feature needs be tested, - how often, - to what extent, - by whom, - with which test equipment, and - how, and also how the results are to be documented. The results of the test planning shall be summarized in a Test Plan.
Test Planning. Test planning for MOT&E will be accomplished in the manner prescribed by Lead OTA directives. The below listed general procedures, however, will be followed:
(1) The Lead OTA will begin the planning process by issuing a call to the Supporting OTAs for their Service user requirements, critical operational issues (COI), test objectives and key resource requirements.
(2) The Lead OTA will consolidate these user requirements, test objectives, key resource requirements, and COIs which will then be agreed to by all Services OTAs involved in the test. Service unique issues will be included as COIs and/or objectives.
(3) The Lead OTA will accommodate Supporting Service OT&E requirements and inputs in the formal coordination action of the TEMP. Coordination actions will accommodate Service unique staffing approval requirements. The TEMP will be prepared in accordance with DoD Regulation 5000.2-R, Appendix III.
(4) Participating OTA project officers will meet for the purpose of assigning responsibility for accomplishment of test objectives to each OTA. These assignments will be made in a mutually agreeable manner. Each agency will then be responsible for resource identification and accomplishment of its assigned test objectives under the direction of the Lead OTA.
(5) The Lead OTA, with assistance from all participating agencies, will develop a matrix to provide a comparison of the user’s requirements, and Service operational criteria. It is not a source document, but it increases management visibility of program requirements, increases communications, and illuminate disconnects. The format of this document should follow that of the Lead OTA.
(6) Each participating agency will then prepare the portion of the overall test plan(s) for its assigned objectives, in the Lead OTA's test plan(s) format, and will identify its data needs.
(7) The Lead OTA will prepare the MOT&E plan(s), consolidating the inputs from all supporting activities. After consolidation, the OT&E plan(s) will be coordinated with the Supporting OTAs.
(8) The Lead OTA will be responsible for conducting test plan briefings for programs requiring OSD oversight.
Test Planning. Test planning will be accomplished in the manner prescribed by the lead OTA’s directives. The lead OTA invites supporting OTAs to participate in early activities (between acquisition entities, developmental testers and operational testers) which focus on developing strategies to leverage and integrate test efforts and use of data between developmental and operational testing (DT and OT). Examples would include the activities of integrated test teams (ITT), early involvement, test and evaluation Working-level IPT (T&E WIPT), integrated product teams (IPT), and program test integration working groups which produce a test and evaluation strategy (TES) per XxXX 5000.(series). Supporting OTAs will participate early in MOT&E planning and remain proactive throughout the test planning process. Safety will be addressed throughout all phases MOT&E test planning. The lead OTA will produce the OTA test plan with concurrence from the Supporting OTAs.
(1) The lead OTA for a MOT&E (Annex G, Glossary) is responsible for initiating the OT&E inputs to the test and evaluation strategy (TES) and test and evaluation master plan (TEMP), ensuring supporting OTA participation in the appropriate multi-Service integrated test team or T&E WIPT, providing lead OTA document guidance, and preparing all OT documents.
(2) The lead OTA is responsible for providing input to the documents, participating in meetings, briefs and working groups as required, participating in data generating events, and providing mutually agreed upon support.
(3) The Lead OTA will utilize integrated DT and OT whenever possible.
(4) Each Service OTA plans resource requirements in accordance with their Service procedures and directives. Some POM (Program Objective Memorandum) for test funding and some rely on the Program Manager (PM)/Joint Program Office (JPO) to fund testing resources. Consequently, the lead OTA will ensure that the TEMP clearly identifies each Service’s specific test resources (assets and funding) and the source of funding (specific PM/JPO, POM, etc).
(5) The lead OTA will begin the planning process by forming a core team comprised of the participating OTAs. The OTAs will communicate Service test requirements, critical operational issues (COI), test objectives, and key resource requirements.
(6) The lead OTA will consolidate test requirements, test objectives, key resource requirements, and test scenarios and gain agreement by all involved Service OTAs. Service- unique issues will be included as...
Test Planning. (i) Providing scheduled reports on progress made on projects in test, including identifying projects in trouble, and those that are on track;
(ii) Creation of test cases
(iii) Identifying reuse opportunities;
(iv) Identifying testing interdependencies between test teams / applications;
(v) Calculate the effort and plan for the schedule/ resources;
(vi) Contribution to the test strategy;
(vii) Preparation of test plans;
(viii) Identification of new test scenarios/ cases /scripts; Schedule A A-46 Health Net / Cognizant Confidential
(ix) Identification of existing regression test cases/ scripts for modification;
(x) Identification of business critical scenarios, and
(xi) Review & approval of test strategy/plan from Health Net SMEs.
Test Planning. (IATF 16949: Chapter 8.5.1) The inspection plan is created on the basis of the production control plan. The inspection plan shows all the characteristics to be inspected with the associated inspection equipment and the inspection frequency for each operation. For special features (#1 and #2), machine and process capability studies (cmk and cpk) are to be scheduled and documented. The planning shall also take into account the identification of training for employees and, if applicable, the set-up of workstations with regard to statistical process control (SPC, control chart technology).
Test Planning. Air Force Activity: USAF will generate a [*****] test plan based on Joby’s Test Requirements Document. The USAF will submit this test plan for Joby’s concurrence.
Test Planning. Since intentional disconnection of consumers is not allowed, the fault localization algorithm performance in real environment will only be possible to assess, after an actual event in MV network. However, estimating the time of the loop (from detecting a fault to reporting fault location) to be completed could be tested with tweaking of fault detection criterion. KPI_09: Quality of the LV grid operation in island mode Responsible Partner: EyPESA Units: Duration [hours] Reason for island mode interruption Waveform quality General background As indicated in WP1, one of the objectives of this project is to demonstrate the possibility to operate the LV grid in island mode. This type of operation is possible thanks to the energy capacity provided by the batteries in the PED. The island mode could be initiated for self-healing purposes, in case for example of a fault occurred in a point upstream the secondary substation, to reconnect the clients that have undergone the interruption. Moreover, in the future, the island mode could become a type of normal operation, within the context of energy communities and local markets, for which the independency from the main grid could be initiated for economic/environmental reasons. Specific definition in the project validation In the phase of project validation, the island mode will be tested and monitored. The quality of the island mode operation, will be evaluated according to three sub-indicators: - Its duration: the island could last during the entire planned period, indicated by the Island Power Management Application (IPMA) or it could end beforehand, due to an unplanned event; - The reason for its interruption: the best-case scenario consists in ending the island as planned, but the interruption could also occur due to a short-circuit, because of unexpected depletion of the energy in the batteries or for other reasons. - The quality of the waveform, making sure it respects the standards defined in EN-50160 (see CI-03) Related use case The use case related to this KPI is HLUC 06: Power management in intentional controlled- island mode General description of the methodology The three sub-indicators will be analyzed as follows: - Duration: simple measurement of the time elapsing between the beginning and the end of the island. - Reason for its interruption: analysis and continuous monitoring of the state of the island to identify the cause of its interruption; - Waveform: analysis and continuous monitoring of waveform ...
Test Planning. The supplier shall create the test specifications in relation to the requirements of the goods and based on its own analyses. They shall include specifications regarding: Test criteria Tolerances Scope of testing Test equipment Test conditions Etc. The test specifications are to be provided upon request for viewing. If requested in the order/contract and/or accompanying documents, the test specifications are to be dis- cussed with and approved by DND.
