Data and Evaluation Sample Clauses

Data and Evaluation. 1. Ensure data in CARE System is current and accurate.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Data and Evaluation. 80. The Parties recognise that comprehensive, accurate and accessible information is critical to mental health and suicide prevention system reform.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Data and Evaluation. A collaborative commitment to tracking results will be key to documenting the long- term effectiveness of the Promise Zone initiative. XXX is committed to working with local partners to track the impact of their efforts and how their community is changing over time. Through its data and evaluation activities, HUD seeks to provide technical assistance and support to Promise Zone designees as they collect data and conduct evaluations of their Promise Zone effort. As outlined in greater detail in Appendix G, Promise Zones Data: Goals and Core Indicators, this approach supports the collection of key individual and community-level outcomes in order to evaluate the impact of the Promise Zone’s activities. This information will be gathered in several ways, as outlined below:
Sample 1Sample 2
Data and Evaluation. ▪ Implement and maintain a secure, web-based ETO System to track outcomes and monitor case activities ▪ Ensure information are current and accurate. ▪ Work with the CFS, evaluators and other DR service providers in the data collection and evaluation of the DR program. ▪ Develop, jointly with the County, data and evaluation procedures.
Sample 1Sample 2
Data and Evaluation. A. School Districts/Independent Charter Schools/CMOs, DCFS, and XXXXX agree to share relevant data to compile lessons learned and track progress.
Sample 1
Data and Evaluation. ▪ Implement and maintain a secure, web-based system to track outcomes and monitor case activities ▪ Ensure information is current and accurate. ▪ Work with the CFS, Program Evaluators and other DR Service Providers in the data collection and evaluation of the DR program. ▪ Develop, jointly with the County, data and evaluation procedures.
Sample 1

Related to Data and Evaluation

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • REPORTING AND EVALUATION The Provider agrees to comply with 7 AAC 81.120, Confidentiality and 7 AAC 81.150, Reports, and other applicable state or federal law regarding the submission of information, including the provisions of Section VI of this Agreement. The Provider agrees to submit any reporting information required under this Agreement and to make available information deemed necessary by DHSS to evaluate the efficacy of service delivery or compliance with applicable state or federal statutes or regulations. The Provider agrees to provide state officials and their representatives access to facilities, systems, books and records, for the purpose of monitoring compliance with this Agreement and evaluating services provided under this Agreement. On-site Quality Assurance Reviews may be conducted by DHSS staff to ensure compliance with service protocols. The Provider will ensure that DHSS staff has access to program files for the purposes of follow-up, quality assurance monitoring and fiscal administration of the program.

  • Data Analysis In the meeting, the analysis that has led the College President to conclude that a reduction- in-force in the FSA at that College may be necessary will be shared. The analysis will include but is not limited to the following: ● Relationship of the FSA to the mission, vision, values, and strategic plan of the College and district ● External requirement for the services provided by the FSA such as accreditation or intergovernmental agreements ● Annual instructional load (as applicable) ● Percentage of annual instructional load taught by Residential Faculty (as applicable) ● Fall 45th-day FTSE inclusive of dual enrollment ● Number of Residential Faculty teaching/working in the FSA ● Number of Residential Faculty whose primary FSA is the FSA being analyzed ● Revenue trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to tuition and fees ● Expenditure trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to personnel and capital ● Account balances for any fees accounts within the FSA ● Cost/benefit analysis of reducing all non-Residential Faculty plus one Residential Faculty within the FSA ● An explanation of the problem that reducing the number of faculty in the FSA would solve ● The list of potential Residential Faculty that are at risk of layoff as determined by the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources ● Other relevant information, as requested

  • Data Quality 4.1 Each party ensures that the shared Personal Data is accurate.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!