Major Findings Sample Clauses

Major Findings. The workshop achieved the short-term objective of increasing participants' knowledge and ability regarding central communication concepts. Gains of from eight to 15 percent were measured in participants' ability to make key distinctions, with the largest and most consistent improvement seen in their ability to distinguish between requests and demands. On a combined measure of discernment skills, individuals scored an average of eight percent higher than pre- workshop at two weeks, and ten percent higher at six weeks, post-workshop. More than half of participants (46 out of 70) indicated before or after the workshop, or both, that they already apply NVC tools and principles in their daily lives. Half of remaining respondents (12 of 24) both entered and left the workshop with very high expectation of applying what they learned. In the two weeks after the workshop, all except one of the 58 respondents reported having used NVC some amount since the workshop: 33 (57 percent) had done so from a few times a week to about every day; 20 (34 percent) said they had applied the skills occasionally; and four (seven percent) said only rarely. Of respondents who had never used NVC tools and principles before, all had done so within the first two weeks, 90 percent of them more than rarely. Over the next month, approximately one-third of respondents applied NVC about every day, one-third a few times a week, and one-third occasionally. Of the 36 new users who responded to the T4 survey, 18 (50 percent) had used it a few times a week or more, and another 14 (39 percent) had done so occasionally. Surveys at T4 also revealed that both participants and observers thought that participants displayed more frequent use of specific workshop-related, positive communication behaviors. Participants were somewhat or much more frequently expressing feelings without blame (83 percent), making requests without pressure (66 percent), and describing events without criticizing (71 percent), according to participants themselves. observers fairly closely echoed these responses (79, 72, and 63 percent, respectively). In addition to putting their communication skills into practice, workshop participants also took measures to further and to share their learning. Two individuals who had not participated in a peer support group before had joined or formed one within the first two weeks after the workshop; and another four had done so by the end of the next month. Seven of 51 respondents at T4 (14 pe...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Major Findings. This subsection gives a summary of major findings gained in the result of this research. Research findings illustrate that there are different factors that shape teachers’ perceptions toward formative assessment. administration and also there is a need in coherent system of professional development courses. Teacher professional development needs to be consistent and ongoing, rather than a quick course (Cambridge International Examinations, 2015). Teachers are likely to expand their knowledge and enhance their expertise on classroom assessment when they are consistently supported and guided in the process of implementation of educational reforms. Many experienced teachers, who received courses on classroom assessment, emphasized that they had professional development courses once in three years. What is more, these professional courses, according to the participants, usually were held for a week or even less days. The participants of the research did not find such courses beneficial for their practice. This factor is aligned with the statement by Xxxxx and Xxxxxx (2003) who claim that short-term professional training sessions from one to five days are not effective. Teachers in order to efficiently utilize formative assessment techniques need to perceive the underlying principles of formative assessment and be ready to change or adapt their teaching practices. Efficient implementation of formative assessment may be ensured, if teachers are involved in the process of the development of formative assessment belief model. Accordingly, as Fullan (2001) states, teachers are the agents of educational change, and therefore, if teachers receive quality ongoing training, as a result they will efficiently implement it into practice. At the same time, as the findings of the research indicate teachers need to accept the reforms, change their mindsets toward the reforms and it requires time. Both novice and experienced teachers had some theoretical knowledge regarding formative assessment, however, they were hesitant in using formative assessment strategies in the lesson. This factor aligns with the study toward formative assessment implementation by Xxxxx and Xxxxxx (1998) which says that the implementation of formative assessment process needs time, support and sustained programs of professional development. The research findings of this particular study are in line with the quantitative study by Xxxxx & Xxxxxxx (2014), which explored the opinions of 20 English teache...
Major Findings. The Framework Agreement has played a significant role in facilitating a coordinated and cooperative approach to irrigation research, demonstration and education.
Major Findings. The Framework Agreement has been successful in creating awareness of its outputs and one or more of the resources (BMPs). # of Resources (BMPs) Used Key Informants Irrigators Resource Key Informants Irrigators Crop Varieties for Irrigation guide 65% 51% Annual ICDC Research and Demonstration Program Report 83% 39% Irrigation Scheduling Manual 35% 27% Canada-Saskatchewan Irrigation Diversification Centre Annual Review Reports 57% 25% Irrigation Economic and Agronomics guide 49% 24% Irrigating with a Centre Pivot 39% 24% Time to Irrigate reports 65% 23% Irrigated Alfalfa Production in Saskatchewan 52% 21% Intensive Irrigation Kicks out $800/Acre 43% 14% Assessment of Irrigation Water Quality in Saskatchewan 50% 13% Corn Production 26% 13% Alberta Irrigation Management Model 22% 12% Management of Irrigated Dry Beans 30% 10% Keeping the Promise 43% 9% Saskatchewan Trickle Irrigation Manual 39% 9% Food Safety/Water Quality 30% 9% Water Quantity and Use Efficiency Indicators for Canada 17% 9% Solar Irrigation Management 30% 7% Season Extension Technology for Vegetable Production in the Prairie Climate 22% 6% Pepper Production Using High Tunnels 26% 5% Develop Agronomic Practices for Small Potato Production in Saskatchewan 26% 5% Organic/Pesticide-free Higher-Value Crops: Sustainable Production, Maintain Quality and Extend Shelf Life 22% 3% Improving Yields, Quality and Product Utilization of Saskatchewan-Grown Milk Thistle 9% 1% Research Areas Key Informants Irrigators Irrigated crop varieties for irrigation evaluations 70% 51% Irrigation management and technologies that reduce requirements for water and energy 70% 46% Irrigated forage crop variety evaluations and efforts on flood irrigation in southwest Saskatchewan 70% 42% Disease management of canola, cereals & flax 57% 33% Identification of suitable varieties and effective agronomic practices for irrigated dry bean production 43% 25% Varietal improvements and development of specific agronomic practices for potatoes 52% 24% Using season extension technology to facilitate production of higher value warm season vegetables in the prairie climate. 57% 18% Development of production practices for organic vegetables 43% 9% Development of agronomic practices for commercial scale mechanized production of medical and nutraceutical plants 22% 8% MAJOR FINDINGS: EVENTS # of Activities Participated In Key Informants Irrigators MAJOR FINDINGS: EVENTS Activities Participated In Key Informants Irrigators CSIDC Annual Irrigat...
Major Findings. 1. Private Enterprise Activities and Opportunities 1 2. Finance and Banking 2 3. Legal and Regulatory Environment 2 4 . and Human Resources 2 5. Assistance Programs Related to Business Development 3 . ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ON PRIVATE XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX 0 X. XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 0 . XXXXXXXXXX -INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY 6 A. COUNTRY BACKGROUND 6 1. Transi.tio.n i.n Perspective 6 2. Progress on the Eve of the Millennium ............................ .................................................. B. INFRASTRUCTURE 8 C. SOCIAL AND HUMAN RESOURCE ISSUES 10 D. FOCUS OF THE STUDY 13 . ECONOMICS THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN AZERBAIJAN .................................. 14 A. MACROECONOMIC PROFILE ................................................................................ ....................... 14 1. Overall Growth Trends 14 2. Employment Characteristics and Human Capital 16 B. SECTOR AND COMPANY SURVEY 20 . Conditions to Sectors 20 2. Taxonomy 24 3. Agriculture and Food Products 25 4 . The Oil Xxxxxx 00 5. Other Manufacturing 28 6. Construction 31 . Services 32 C. THE SME SECTOR AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT 33 . FINANCE AND ENABLING .......................................................................... 37 A. Banking and Finance 37 1. The System 37 2. Bank Equity Base 38 3. Bank Lending and Deposits .................................................................................................. 4. Major Players in the Sector .................................................................................... 40 5 . Constraints on the Development Banking Sector .......................................................
Major Findings. The final sections of this report articulate more than 20 important findings and 11 major categories of constraints, each with several critical implications for private sector development. In this five primary findings are presented with selected points of emphasis to solidify the most salient issues.
Major Findings. Since the Agreement was signed in 2005, DJS cured nearly all of the deficits noted in the DOJ’s Findings Letter.1 In part, these changes were made possible by the significant fiscal resources that were dedicated to improving the conditions of confinement and the quality of care at Xxxxxx and Cheltenham. These resources, along with the unwavering commitment of agency and facility administrators, clerical staff, professional and line staff, and community volunteers, have radically improved the care and treatment of youth and also enabled to State to satisfy nearly all of the extensive requirements of this Agreement in just three years. To be sure, there have been many programmatic changes that substantially improved the quality of care at Cheltenham and Xxxxxx. These are discussed throughout the body of this report. Many of these programmatic improvements were greatly facilitated by changes to the facilities’ configuration. For example: ▪ The size of the facilities and the level of crowding have been drastically reduced. At the time the DOJ conducted its initial tour in 2003, Cheltenham had 180 beds and housed 216 youth (20% over capacity). Since the Agreement was signed, Cheltenham reduced its capacity to 110 beds and the average daily population for the first four months of 2008 was 100 youth. When the DOJ conducted its tour, Xxxxxx had 330 beds for both detained and committed youth and housed 263 youth. Currently, Xxxxxx operates only a 72‐bed detention program and the average daily population for the first four months of 2008 was 60 youth. ▪ Staff supervision of youth has improved dramatically given enhanced staff‐youth ratios. In its Findings Letter, DOJ noted that staff‐to‐youth ratios had been as high as 1—20 during the day and 1—60 at night. Obviously, the lack of supervision created many opportunities for violence to occur. Throughout latter part of the period the Agreement was in effect, both facilities were routinely staffed at 1—8 during the day and 1—16 at night. Since 2005, the State spent approximately $1.9 million to improve the physical plant at both facilities. Among the improvements were new medical clinics at both facilities and the renovation of a building at Hickey which situated facility administrators inside the facility’s fence and also allowed for expanded youth indoor recreation areas and incentive programs. In addition, the State committed over $2.5 million per year for a contract with Glass Health & Associates to provide mental h...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Major Findings 

Related to Major Findings

  • MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL Not later than 16 court days before the calendared Final Approval Hearing, Plaintiff will file in Court, a motion for final approval of the Settlement that includes a request for approval of the PAGA settlement under Labor Code section 2699, subd. (l), a Proposed Final Approval Order and a proposed Judgment (collectively “Motion for Final Approval”). Plaintiff shall provide drafts of these documents to Defense Counsel not later than seven days prior to filing the Motion for Final Approval. Class Counsel and Defense Counsel will expeditiously meet and confer in person or by telephone, and in good faith, to resolve any disagreements concerning the Motion for Final Approval.

  • Presentation of Potential Target Businesses The Company shall cause each of the Initial Shareholders to agree that, in order to minimize potential conflicts of interest which may arise from multiple affiliations, the Initial Shareholders will present to the Company for its consideration, prior to presentation to any other person or company, any suitable opportunity to acquire an operating business, until the earlier of the consummation by the Company of a Business Combination or the liquidation of the Company, subject to any pre-existing fiduciary obligations the Initial Shareholders might have.

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION The undersigned (authorized official signing for the contracting organization) certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that the contractor, defined as the primary participant in accordance with 45 CFR Part 76, and its principals: are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal Department or agency have not within a 3-year period preceding this contract been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; are not presently indicted or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in Section 2 of this certification; and have not within a 3-year period preceding this contract had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default. Should the Contractor or Subrecipient not be able to provide this certification, an explanation as to why should be placed after the assurances page in the contract. The contractor agrees by signing this contract that it will include, without modification, the clause above certification in all lower tier covered transactions (i.e., transactions with sub-grantees and/or contractors) and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions in accordance with 45 CFR Part 76.

  • Reportable Events Involving the Xxxxx Law Notwithstanding the reporting requirements outlined above, any Reportable Event that involves solely a probable violation of section 1877 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §1395nn (the Xxxxx Law) should be submitted by Practitioner to CMS through the self-referral disclosure protocol (SRDP), with a copy to the OIG. If Practitioner identifies a probable violation of the Xxxxx Law and repays the applicable Overpayment directly to the CMS contractor, then Practitioner is not required by this Section III.G to submit the Reportable Event to CMS through the SRDP.

  • Proposed Corrective Action Plan Simultaneously with the submission of the Audit, the Recipient will submit to OCR for its review and approval a proposed Corrective Action Plan to address all inaccessible content and functionality identified during the Recipient’s Audit. The proposed Corrective Action Plan will set out a detailed schedule for: (1) addressing problems, taking into account identified priorities, with all corrective actions to be completed within 18 months of the date OCR approved the Corrective Action Plan; (2) setting up systems of accountability and verifying claims of accessibility by vendors or open sources; and setting up a system of testing and accountability to maintain the accessibility of all online content and functionality on an ongoing basis.

  • Deemed Compliance with Proposition 65 The Parties agree that compliance by Xxxxxxxx with this Settlement Agreement constitutes compliance with Proposition 65 with respect to exposure to DEHP from use of the Products.

  • Certification Regarding Debarment Party certifies under pains and penalties of perjury that, as of the date that this Agreement is signed, neither Party nor Party’s principals (officers, directors, owners, or partners) are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or excluded from participation in Federal programs, or programs supported in whole or in part by Federal funds.

  • Acceptable Modifications This Guaranty shall be binding upon the Guarantor and upon its successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Guaranteed Party and their successors and assigns; provided, however, that the Guarantor may not assign or transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the Guaranteed Party. The assignment rights of the Guaranteed Party will be in accordance with any applicable terms of the Agreement. Any assignment in violation of this Section 8 shall be void and of no effect.

  • Benchmark Replacement Conforming Changes In connection with the use, administration, adoption or implementation of a Benchmark Replacement, the Administrative Agent will have the right to make Conforming Changes from time to time and, notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein or in any other Loan Document, any amendments implementing such Conforming Changes will become effective without any further action or consent of any other party to this Agreement or any other Loan Document.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!