PLANNING HISTORY Sample Clauses

PLANNING HISTORY. The following planning history is relevant to the proposal and the immediate surrounding area; • 21/00507/FUL - Erection of synchronous condenser and associated ancillary infrastructure - Land East Of Eccles Substation – Approved • 21/01299/FUL - Formation of access junction and track to provide maintenance access for the Eccles Synchronous Condenser - Withdrawn • 21/01567/FUL - Formation of access junction and track to provide maintenance access for the Eccles Synchronous Condenser – Land South East Of Eccles Substation – Approved • 22/01532/S36 - Erection of Battery Electricity Storage System (XXXX) and Associated Infrastructure - Land East Of Fernyrig Farm – SBC recommended approval to the Energy Consents Unit (ECU), final determination is awaited from ECU • 22/01988/FUL - Construction and operation of battery energy storage system facility with ancillary infrastructure and access - Land West Of Eccles Substation Eccles – Approved • 23/01038/S36 – Development of Battery Energy Storage System – Land West of Eccles Sub Station No third party representations have been received. • PAC Report • Planning Statement • Landscape and Visual Assessment • Archaeological Assessments • Ecological Assessment • Preliminary Environmental Assessment • Noise Survey • Flood Risk Assessment • Transport Statement PMD1 Sustainability PMD2 Quality Standards ED9 Renewable Energy Development ED10 Protection of Agricultural Land and Carbon Rich Soils HD3 Protection of Residential Amenity EP1 International Nature Conservation Sites and Protected Species EP2 National Nature Conservations Sites and Protected Species EP3 Local Biodiversity EP8 Archaeology EP10 Gardens and Designated Landscapes EP13 Trees Woodlands and Hedgerows EP15 Development Affecting the Water Environment IS8 Flooding IS9 Waste Water Treatment Standards and Sustainable Urban Drainage IS13 Contaminated Land • Biodiversity (2005) • Landscape and Development (2008) • Local Biodiversity Action Plan: Biodiversity in the Scottish Borders (2001) • Local Landscape Designations (2012) • Placemaking and Design (2010) • Renewable Energy (2018) • Trees and Development (2008) 1 Tackling the climate and nature crises 2 Climate mitigate and adaptation3 3 Biodiversity 5 Soils 7 Historic assets and places 11 Energy 14 Design, Quality and Place 22 Flood risk and water management 23 Health and safety 29 Rural Development

PLANNING HISTORY. A summary of all previous known land use decisions affecting the applicant’s property and a list of all outstanding conditions of approval with respect to such prior land use decisions.

PLANNING HISTORY. 2.1 The LG Companies undertake that following the coming into force of the LDO, they will not commence any new development on the Property in reliance on any of the Old Permissions and will only proceed with the Development or such other development as may be authorised in the future by the LDO or any new planning permission. 2.2 TBC, in its own right and as successor to the UDC and the LG Companies agree that the Old Agreement and the Deed of Variation will, as of the date of the coming into force of the LDO, be cancelled and of no further effect and will in all respects be superseded by the provisions of this Agreement. 2.3 The Parties acknowledge that the LG Companies have already performed certain of the obligations under the Old Agreements that related to aspects of the development authorised by the Old Permissions and they are set out in Schedule 3.

PLANNING HISTORY. 3.1 The site has a long planning history. Most relevant to this proposal is the extant outline planning permission for a residential led development, granted on 21 November 2014, subject to conditions and a legal agreement (ref: 2012/02454/OUT). The development is for: 'Demolition of all existing buildings and structures and; outline planning application for a comprehensive residential led mixed use redevelopment; comprising 11 building plots, with building heights ranging from 8 - 32 storeys (plus basement/podium level); to develop up to a maximum of 1,150 residential units (Class C3); offices and employment uses (Class B1); shops, services, cafes, restaurants, bars and take-aways (Classes A1-A5); health, crèche and multi-purpose community facilities (Class D1); leisure facilities (Class D2); associated infrastructure works including basement and surface level car parking and servicing; a vehicular and pedestrian bridge, access roads and footways; energy centres; provision of new open spaces including a public garden, urban square, communal and private courtyards and gardens, together with other landscaping works, ancillary accommodation and associated works’. 3.2 Conservation area consent (ref: 2017/02033/CAC) was granted on 20 December 2017 for a phased 'Demolition of buildings and structures within Conservation Area'. Most of the site has now been cleared. Forest House would be demolished at a later stage as part of the proposed phased masterplan, subject to planning approval. 3.3 A reserved matters application (ref: 2017/02538/RES) was granted 14 November 2017 for the 'submission of reserved matters relating to the details of access pursuant to outline planning permission reference 2012/02454/OUT'. This consent safeguarded the extant residential led outline planning permission as the first application for approval of Reserved Matters was required to be submitted before the expiration of 3 years from the date of the outline permission. It is not the applicant’s intended course of action to progress with the development as approved in the outline application 2012/02454/OUT. The current outline masterplan, the subject of this report would replace the existing approved proposals. 3.4 On 4 July 2018, permission was granted for ‘Meanwhile Space’ in the proposed masterplan proposals, limited for a temporary period of 10 years from the first occupation (ref: 2017/04276/FUL). Permission was approved for three 4-storey modular buildings to provide 25,486sqm (GE...

PLANNING HISTORY. A previous application for residential development on the site was submitted in 2008 (08/00436/OUT) and ultimately withdrawn after the site was not included in the Scottish Borders Local Plan approved amendments. It was then subsequently considered and discounted during the Local Development Plan process, including rejection by the LDP Examination Reporter. It was then promoted by the land owner again as part of the Supplementary Guidance (SG) on Housing but discounted at the first stage by the Department, thus not being included in the SG as a preferred or alternative site. A further application for planning permission in principle for residential development was submitted for the field, including the site, in 2017 (17/00015/PPP). This was refused by the Council in October 2017 for the following reasons:

PLANNING HISTORY. A new High School was constructed to the east of the Earlston as part of the 3 High Schools project. Part of the former high school was demolished with the retained building now occupied by the Primary School. The following planning approvals at this site are relevant to this proposal:  05/01561/OUT - Demolition of High School and erection of sixty five dwellinghouses – Withdrawn prior to determination.  13/00348/DEN - Partial demolition of high school – Prior Approval granted to permit commencement of demolition works. Twenty-three letters of objection have been received, 10 of which are from the same address. The grounds of objection can be summarised as follows:  Density  Health Issues  Inadequate boundary fencing  Inadequate drainage  Inadequate screening  Height  Land affected  Loss of light  Detrimental impact on tennis courts via blocking (especially during winter) impacting on usability and maintenance of the courts with adjacent path causing surface water issues  Privacy of neighbouring properties affected  Poor design  Location of secondary access closer to town centre and away from school congestion will mean it’s used more frequently than primary access  Design of secondary access route through industrial estate is unsuitable for residential traffic (including pedestrians)  Lack of amenity space  Trees/landscape affected  Road safety  Conflict with industrial site operations and traffic  Insufficient parking provision  Use of  Increased traffic causing congestion specifically during ‘school run’ times  Existing primary school does not have capacity to serve development  Ground contamination  Poor pedestrian access though the development and linking with surrounding network Two general comments have been submitted which raise road safety and access concerns.  Design and Access Statement  Drainage Strategy  Flood Risk Assessment  Tree Survey  Land Contamination Assessment  Feasibility and Energy Statement  Noise Impact Assessment and Addendum  Environmental Management Plan PMD2: Quality Standards PMD3: Land Use Allocations HD1: Affordable and Special Needs Housing HD3: Protection of Residential Amenity EP1: International Nature Conservation Sites and Protected Species EP2: National Nature Conservation Sites and Protected Species EP3: Local Biodiversity EP4: National Scenic Areas EP8: Archaeology EP13: Trees, Woodlands and Hedgerows EP15: Development Affecting the Water Environment IS1: Public Infrastructure and Lo...

PLANNING HISTORY. Application Number Proposal Decision SUMMARY INFORMATION REPRESENTATIONS Barkham Parish Council: In principle Barkham Parish Council support the school. The Council have the following comments and objections on the application. Arborfield & Xxxxxxx Parish Council: The Parish Council has no comments to make on the above application.

PLANNING HISTORY. The existing stable building was approved under planning consent reference 07/01986/FUL in 2008 24 objections have been received, as have 22 supporting representations. A separate commentary on behalf of objectors on certain issues has also been received. All are available to view on Public Access and a summary of the main points raised is noted below:

PLANNING HISTORY. 3.1 The site has been used as a printing and bookbinding works. The works were automated about 1983 with around 33 employees. The business went into administrative receivership in October 2001.The number of employees fell to 12. It shut at the end of 2001 The Probation Service occupied part of the first floor with about 15 staff until February 2001. Subsequently the entire property has been vacant 3.2 On 13.4.2004 the Council's Planning Applications Committee resolved to grant planning permission and conservation area consent for development of the site by:- Partial demolition of existing buildings and redevelopment including the erection of a three storey building and an additional storey to retained building together with associated works to provide ground and part first floor office (Class B1) units and 14 self contained flats on part first and second floors including terraces to front elevation, with associated landscaping and refuse storage. (ref 03/02178/FUL) Permission is subject to a Section 106 Agreement to secure:- affordable housing were the scheme to be revised to provide 15 plus units; payment for highway markings to restrict on-street car parking, and a contribution towards a scheme to improve bus, pedestrian and cycle facilities of Herne Hill junction. To date the Agreement remains to be completed. 3.3 On 29.4.2005 Conservation Area Consent for demolition was refused on 29.4.2005. (ref 05/00725/CON) The reason for refusal was:- 3.4 On 6.6.2005 Planning permission was refused for ‘Redevelopment of site, with retention of facades to Xxxxxxx Road / Croxted Road erection of part single, part two, three part four storey building to provide 43 flats (17 of which would be affordable housing) together with landscaping including roof garden.(ref 05/00724) The reasons for refusal were:- 1 The proposed development by reason of its design, external appearance, bulk, height and form would have an unacceptable and detrimental impact on the character of the retained building and streetscene and would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of this part of Xxxxxxxxx Park Conservation Area. As such the proposal is contrary to Policies CD2, CD15 and CD18 of the adopted Lambeth Unitary Development plan (August 1998) and Policies 31, 32, 36 and 42 of the Revised Deposit Replacement Unitary Development Plan (June 2004). 2 The high number and poor internal layout of the proposed flats, the bulk of the building and lack of amenity space constitute...

PLANNING HISTORY. 9.1 13th July 2017 (16/01780/FULM): Conditional planning permission granted to “Demolish existing building and erect three storey building comprising of 16 self- contained flats on first and second floor with balconies and roof terrace with retail unit on ground floor, lay out parking bin store and alter vehicular access at 0000- 0000 Xxxxxx Xxxx”.