Good morning Sample Clauses

Good morning. My company would like to attend this webinar for RFP #PSA5 ‘CONSULTANT PLANNING SERVICE AGREEMENT for NYMTC’: Pre-Proposal Webinar: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 at 2 PM Eastern Standard Time (EST) I would like to attend the webinar for preproposal information on the NYMTC PSA#5 scheduled for today. Can you please send me the details of the webinar? I missed the pre-proposal webinar. Is it possible to get a link to the recording? Main Body of the RFP:

Good morning. Thanks for your responses about having access to USASCN. Since you all have access to this program, I have attached some directions for using the program to check the status of your account balances. To explain briefly how it works, when you make a deposit, it is posted to the Receipt account and automatically adds to the Cash Account in one transaction. When an expense is made, it posts immediately and automatically to the Budget account and the Cash Account at the same time. Therefore, the cash account is always correct at any point in time with a current cash balance (and includes encumbrances). Budget accounts for Funds 009, 018 and 200 are then increased only after receipts are posted. If that step is not done at the exact time as the receipt is posted, you can find that the balance on a BUDSUM may be low by the most recent revenues that you have deposited. The Budget accounts need to be "updated" every time a receipt is deposited/posted. Therefore, when you have questions regarding a balance in one of your accounts, using the USASCN Account File Maintenance Program is the quickest and most reliable way to check your balances. If you see a discrepancy between a BUDUM or Budget account balance and the Cash balance, it is likely because your most recent receipts have not been posted to the Budget account. This applies only to your Funds 007, 009, 018, and 200. If you want to review a general fund account balance, you can use USASCN anytime with the 02 (budget) code in front of the account number. General fund accounts are not updated by receipts deposited. If you have any questions or have any difficulty when you experiment with this program, please feel free to call Xxxxx or me for help. We'll be happy to walk you through it or come out to your building to work with you. I hope this information proves to be useful to you! Xxx BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE OAPSE UNION LOCAL #131 COVENTRY LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Board President Union President Superintendent COVENTRY LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Classified Personnel – Evaluation Form (Appendix B) EMPLOYEE __________________________ LOCATION ___________________ POSITION __________________________ DATE __________________________ Evaluation Code: E -Excellent G - Good S-- Satisfactory NI--Needs Improvement U--Unsatisfactory 1. Performs job duties effectively Comment:

Good morning. 10 Q. Just a couple of questions. So, I take it as a 11 general matter, you support decoupling mechanisms as 12 a way to optimize utility investment in energy 13 efficiency; is that fair? 14 A. Yes. 15 Q. And in this case, you specifically support the 16 original proposal by National Grid. 17 A. Yes. 18 Q. In Xx. Xxxxxx'x testimony, he concluded -- or 19 recommended that the Company's proposal be rejected, 20 but he proposed some other refinements. I guess, 21 what's your reaction to his testimony? Do you think 22 that it was unnecessary to do those other types of 23 refinements? Do you think those other refinements 24 could have made it a better mechanism? I just want 3 A. I don't remember his specific recommendations. If 4 you could refresh my memory on -- I think there were 5 two or three, one of which may have been excluding 6 the low-income class altogether. But one of -- I 7 can't remember if he was calling for an increase in 8 customer charges or what the specifics of his... 9 (Xx. Xxxxxx hands document to the 10 witness.) 11 BY CHAIRMAN XXXX: 12 Q. This is basically on Page 28 of Xx. Xxxxxx'x 13 testimony, at the bottom. 14 (Witness reviews document.) 15 A. Oh, so he was talking about the potential for 16 reducing the Company's allowed XXX. That's 17 definitely a type of change that can be made, 18 especially if you see that the Company is going to be 19 evaluated as less risky. 20 For example: The Regulatory Assistance Project 21 has actually proposed in a couple of its 22 presentations that one other possibility, as opposed 23 to just reducing XXX, would be to change the 24 debt-to-equity ratio, that that would also have a

Good morning. 15 Could you please state and spell your name 16 for the record. 17 A. Xxxxx Xxxx, K-A-I N. 18 Q. And what is your current employment 19 status? 20 A. I'm retired from United Airlines. 21 Q. When were you first hired by United? 22 A. 1963. 23 Q. And when did you retire from United? 24 A. In 2008.

Good morning. Am I right in saying that you are one of the joint administrators of both LCF and LOG?

Good morning. As I understand it, you are one of the joint administrators for LCF and lead administrator who managed shareholdings in IOG held by LOG; is that right?

Good morning. Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman. Thank you for having me here today to testify. My main purpose here today is to make two points concerning the U.S. Government's application of the restriction on foreign investment in U.S. airlines, and this is from our direct experience in the last year. The first is that the larger pool of capital that is attracted to an airline, the more its employees, its customers, its creditors, and the communities that it serves will benefit. Second, the regulatory uncertainty that exists in many regulatory processes, including the one that we are considering today, represents a serious deterrent to investors. Now while neither of these conclusions amounts to a revelation, the application of the existing law on foreign ownership has, in our view, limited the pool of available capital to fund U.S. airlines and has made the prospect of investing in U.S. airlines that much less attractive. Though we believe that the current restrictions on foreign ownership should be changed, we also support DOT's position that clarifying the limits under the current law and broadening their interpretation is good public policy. Hawaiian has firsthand experience regarding the applications of the restrictions on foreign ownership. Emerging from bankruptcy is often an obstacle course, and in our case there were few obstacles as high or as slippery as persuading DOT that Hawaiian Airlines was owned and controlled by U.S. citizens. A common sense review of our circumstance would have confirmed our U.S. citizenship in minutes, but the process that we were obliged to follow took five months, was fraught with uncertainty, and was unbelievably costly. The investors who bought Hawaiian Holdings which is the parent of Hawaiian Airlines were a group of hedge funds, all based in the United States, all managed by U.S. citizens, and having no appreciable concentration of foreign funds. However, because the source of some of the capital being invested in Hawaiian was of foreign origin, we faced a daunting regulatory review. Explaining to the sophisticated and worldly U.S. investors that having an insignificant portion of their managed funds contributed by non-U.S. citizens could lead to the revocation of our operating certificate was an event not to have been missed. They were incredulous, having not previously encountered a regulatory scheme so utterly disconnected with the nature of today's financial world nor one so seemingly capricious. To its great credit, XXX took...

Good morning. I would like to welcome everyone this morning. We are getting accustomed to some of the new electronic and other improvements that have been made here in the committee room. This is the first time we are doing our hearing in these renovated facilities. And we are pleased to see Xxxxx Xxxxxx back. Where is Xx. Xxxxxx? Everybody wishes him a speedy recovery. [Applause.] Mr. Xxxx. It looks like he is doing well and back at it again. We do appreciate his many years of service, and it does take a toll on one's health, but we appreciate all he has done and wish him a speedy recovery. Well, this morning, the Aviation Subcommittee's hearing is going to deal with the United States and European Union Open Skies Agreement, and also the other subject that is closely related is the Department of Transportation's Notice of a Proposed Rule Change relating to actual control dealing with aviation ownership issues. The order of business will start with opening statements. I will start with mine and then yield to members. Then I believe we have two panels of witnesses today, and we will proceed with those witnesses. So, again, I would like to welcome everyone this morning, and we will go ahead and get started. I have an opening statement, and I will proceed with that and then, as I said, will yield to other members. This morning's hearing, as I said, will focus on two issues that are both timely, and I believe very important. The Subcommittee will receive testimony, first about the Department of Transportation's Actual Control Rulemaking Proposal, and then secondly, we are going to take a look and review the status of the tentative Open Skies Agreement between the United States and the European Union. There is some urgency to resolving these issues. Several United States airlines in recent months have announced plans to expand and in some cases to significantly increase their international services. This reflects the increasingly common belief that greater service to foreign locations will be a very key element in the U.S. airline industry's efforts to recover from some four years of very difficult financial problems. The American aviation industry has lost, as we know, some $40 billion since 2001. It does need the freedom today to compete and succeed anywhere and everywhere. Some of the best future opportunities for expansion will really depend on having U.S. cities link with growing markets that are across the globe. All of us in labor management, U.S. communities, and gov...

Good morning. I'm in the Sierras a lot and catch CapRadio often. Their programming is different‐‐‐if you experience "poor me", "I was born in a log cabin" to mixed parents", stories in NSPR, you should listen to Sacramento. They have a different audience, more urban, they're carried in Reno and Tahoe and, I'm tempted to believe, they will eventually dominate the NorCal programming. Consider the merge carefully. Thanks. I live in Penn Valley south of Chico and am not in your “listening area”. The reception is better from Chico than Sac, and I like your programing better—more local, rural and the weather reports are more relative to Penn Valley than Sac weather. I hope you will maintain the local flavor. I am a sustaining member. As an avid listener to NSPR, I would hope that its programming would not change. I listen to NPR where ever I go…from various cities in California and clear across the US…and I’ve never… to date…found an NPR station to equal that of NSPR. I listen to just about every program when home (whether I’m sewing upstairs or cooking down), (from the Xxx Hour, Selected Shorts, Afternoon Classics, Fresh Air….love the interview by Xxxxx, etc.). and have always been amazed at the diversity, integrity, value of local interests/needs, and high standards of professionalism. In short, it’s terrific as is….and I would hate to see it change or cater to the wants of a large metropolitan city. Sacramento is a great place…lived there for a few years, but I could see its ‘tastes’ with it’s larger population easily changing the direction/programming. Again, I’ve listened to dozens of NPR stations, and this one is a gem among them. Please don’t change. How will this effect local coverage? What guarantees do NSPR staff have for maintaining their current positions? As a loyal listener, this proposed merger appears to be a positive one, giving our journalists more resources at their disposal for investigating and reporting. However, will this jeopardize current NSPR staff employment? Will any local NSPR jobs be lost due to this possible change? I hope the amazing local shows like Blue Dot continue ‐ and even expand! I'm concerned that this management agreement will turn out like the one initiated between CapRadio and KUOW in Stockton a couple of decades ago. KUOW became nothing more than a translator for CapRadio and all its unique programming disappeared. Xxxx Xxxxx has assured me that this won't happen with NSPR, but I'm still concerned. I have read the FAQs and it appear...

Good morning. I’d like to begin by thanking President Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, and Senator Xxxx for their extraor- dinary work in Haiti. They got in very early this morning; they have had hardly any sleep for the last 2 nights, as they have worked vir- tually around the clock. The peaceful solution they helped to work out is another major con- tribution in all their careers, which have been devoted to the pursuit of peace and democracy. They have done a great service to our country, as well as to the people of Haiti, the people in our hemisphere, and the efforts of the United Nations, and we owe them a great deal of grati- tude. I also want to thank the men and women of our United States armed services, who are beginning their operations in Haiti even as we meet here today. Their preparation and pres-